|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: ottawa
|
I am intrigued by the bipole concept and I am thinking about these FE127 ones. Do bipole drivers need to be back to back? Can I have front/top, front/side?
Thanks Jonathan |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: British Antarctic Territory
|
To function as designed, they need to be front/back.
That is because the rearward speaker compensates exactly for baffle step losses. Also, the direct physical coupling of the two drivers adds structural integrity. |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2.5cu ft bipole, Suggestions? | johnnyb831 | Multi-Way | 5 | 14th May 2012 06:55 AM |
| 3 way bipole loudspeakers | Thomasjunta | Multi-Way | 3 | 31st August 2007 08:38 PM |
| Lowther bipole | britbug | Full Range | 16 | 6th May 2007 03:50 AM |
| t-amp with fostex 127e bipole or FR125 bipole? | alexg | Full Range | 6 | 23rd August 2006 07:49 AM |
| Bipole efficiency | Jeb-D. | Full Range | 12 | 27th January 2006 06:55 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |