Running full range (FR125) driver direct to amp...?? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Full Range

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 17th February 2006, 04:08 PM   #1
JRace is offline JRace  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Vernon, BC
Default Running full range (FR125) driver direct to amp...??

My question is, what are the drawbacks to having nothing in line between the amp and the driver? (ie no crossovers, resitors, circuts etc)

I have read about baffle step issues, baffle difraction issues, and am unsure if I do need to compensate for anything with these speakers.

I have built a pair of FR 125's in a small sealed 7lt box. This is my first DIY speaker and have chossen this driver to keep things simple. I have just constructed a 7ltr sealed box with 3/4 mdf. The box is not finished as I am still testing it out before I put the finishing touches on it. I may still port the box.

The box is 8" wide, and 12.5" tall.

My initial listining impressions (<2hrs total run time on drivers) are that this driver is more than cabable in the highs, however the lows seem slightly reduced. Now being my first time with full range drivers I do not quite know what I should expect.

The room is very open, with the speakers 8 ft from my seat, and 6 ft between them (cannot change at this time). One is 3 ft from the back wall and the other is 5 ft. THey are on stands which puts the driver at my ear height when I am seated.

They are being powered by a Marantz sr5300 AV reciever.
Then end gaol for these speakers will by in my home office as computer speakers placed on my desk.

What am I missing out on by not having any circuts in my design?

Thanks.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th February 2006, 04:29 PM   #2
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Hi,

the probable answer is not much.

The sound nearfield on your desk will have much
more bass than the sound farfield on open stands.

Nearfield speakers usually do not have baffle step compensation.

/sreten.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th February 2006, 04:49 PM   #3
Vikash is offline Vikash  United Kingdom
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
 
Vikash's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: UK
If you turn your question around a bit to does the FR125S need filters, then this may be of interest: FR125S Measurements and Filters

I think 7 litres might be a tad small to go ported with. I definitely prefer the 125 ported. With sealed cab I found stuffing should be kept to minimum as well.

You can use this driver without any filters if you want. It has a few peaks in the upper end which on paper require attention, but me ears don't mind. I also don't see a clear BSC requirement in my measurements.
__________________
"The human mind is so constituted that it colours with its own previous conceptions any new notion that presents itself for acceptance." - J. Wilhelm. (But I still think mine sounds better than yours.)
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th February 2006, 06:32 PM   #4
chrisb is offline chrisb  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: victoria BC
A bipole pair of WR/FR in 25litre sealed box sounds wonderful, and trust me, doesn't require any BSC

http://www.planet10-hifi.com/sealed.html

For DAF (domestic acceptance factor) alone I quite prefer these to the all variants of the straight bipole MLTLs with the same driver complement.

Not enough bass output is generally NOT a problem with these drivers in an appropriate box. I think 7l is definitely too small; you honestly might be better off doing over again.

For ported enclosure, the 13 liter monopole mini-Onken is quite amazing as well, but with the bevelled treatement of the front/sides, is a bit of a complicated build compared to a simple sealed or conventially ported box.

http://homepage.mac.com/tlinespeaker...O-examples.jpg

plans:

http://homepage.mac.com/tlinespeaker...iOnken-map.gif


I guess it would help if I read your post fully to understand the application before mouthing off - for small nearfield monitor you're probably restricted to height and width of enclosure but not the depth. If you could live with the dimensions, the folded MLTL for the following FE127 MLTL could work nicely as well:

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...995#post786995
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th February 2006, 06:34 PM   #5
JRace is offline JRace  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Vernon, BC
Thanks for the info. I will read through the other thread for more info.

Seeing as the end goal is a near field monitor sitting on a computer desk with the future possiblity of being augmented with a powered sub I was not too concerned wit the inital low bass ouput.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2006, 01:12 PM   #6
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Quote:
Originally posted by chrisb
A bipole pair of ......... and trust me, doesn't require any BSC

Hi,

its not a question of trust, bipoles by definition do not exhibit baffle step.

/sreten.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2006, 10:40 PM   #7
Vikash is offline Vikash  United Kingdom
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
 
Vikash's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: UK
Just thinking out loud here.

But what about drivers which do not require BSC (or as much of it) due to their inherent response (TB W3-871S, or even the FR125S if my measurements are to be believed). Using them in bipole config would tip the bass the other way wouldn't it?

Or should I say BS is not wholly compensated for simply by using a bipole config neccessaily...
__________________
"The human mind is so constituted that it colours with its own previous conceptions any new notion that presents itself for acceptance." - J. Wilhelm. (But I still think mine sounds better than yours.)
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2006, 10:46 PM   #8
Vikash is offline Vikash  United Kingdom
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
 
Vikash's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: UK
Ignore me. Of course its completely compensated for. It just doesn't mean the result will be a flat FR.
__________________
"The human mind is so constituted that it colours with its own previous conceptions any new notion that presents itself for acceptance." - J. Wilhelm. (But I still think mine sounds better than yours.)
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st February 2006, 04:39 PM   #9
JRace is offline JRace  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Vernon, BC
Well I moved the speakers into my office, and am powering it with an onkyo 603 av receiver (for now).

The speakers are sitting on my desk, with the drivers just shy of ear level. Pleasantly the low-end response has improved.

Once the weather warms up I will be finishing the speakers with veneer (species undecided)...when that happens I will post some pics.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st February 2006, 07:07 PM   #10
Dumbass is offline Dumbass  British Antarctic Territory
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: British Antarctic Territory
Quote:
Originally posted by Vikash
But what about drivers which do not require BSC (or as much of it) due to their inherent response (TB W3-871S, or even the FR125S if my measurements are to be believed). Using them in bipole config would tip the bass the other way wouldn't it?
I think it all depends on how you tune the enclosure. I think some people tune enclosures to have a bit of a hump in the hundreds to compensate for baffle step dropoff. Obviously you wouldn't want to do this with a bipole setup.

I also wonder how far from back wall is recommended for bipole.

Rear-firing driver is still producing high freqs, allbeit indirectly.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No-Name full range Driver ArjenShenzhen Full Range 13 18th August 2008 12:19 PM
FS: One Jordan JX 92S Full Range Driver Firebottle Swap Meet 8 27th July 2006 11:26 PM
Full range driver for UK bond Full Range 4 18th March 2005 03:30 PM
cheap full range driver A'af Full Range 4 30th December 2003 02:00 AM
Full Range Driver PassFan Full Range 4 18th November 2003 03:28 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:51 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2