|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I was thinking something better and more suited, like the Visaton B200. If budget and/or shielding are issues then the FE127E does really well on OB. Then you can use those later as outstanding computer speakers when you upgrade to something a bit better like the B200.
__________________
Everyone has a photographic memory. It's just that most are out of film. |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Wisconsin
|
I wouldn't think a 127 on an open baffle would be able to reach very high SPL's due to a limited excursion. The 207 would probably be alright on open baffle at high volumes, I would however make sure to have it crossed over at 100Hz. Note that the response of the driver will already be falling by this point so you take a carefull look at your crossover point/slope. And depending on the size of your baffle some EQ might be needed.
I would probably stick with a sealed design if you wanted to keep the complexity down. I don't know about bass, but I think as far as treble/midrange a large sealed enclosure can perform (please no flames) quite well, and will hold it's own against open baffle. Everybodys taste and priorities are different though. Joe |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I use the FE206 on OB, but it definitely needs a helper woofer. You might be able to use a shallow slope XO on your woofers and a little EQ on the 207's to get away with not using an additional driver.
Since you already have OB for the bottom end, I think using a FR that gives you the ability to go OB results in more flexibility. You can always put them in a box later. Re the FE127, I've run mine pretty loud (approaching 100db) without a high pass filter, so cutting them at 100hz may get you there for under $100/pr .
__________________
Everyone has a photographic memory. It's just that most are out of film. |
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Wisconsin
|
Quote:
100db in open baffle with no crossover? I would think you would be pushing well past the excursion limits on a regular basis. Fostex drivers are not exactly known for their huge excursion capabilities. Have you tried it with a high pass? I would have to imagine it would clean up the sound. I ran my 108's in a sealed enclosure for a while with no crossover, I've since switched to running them with a capacitor to ease the load on the little guys. It's really helped clean the sound up quite a bit. just a thought. Joe |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
That was just temporary. I didn't play them that loud with any bass heavy music. I'm just waiting on my active XO to arrive. I tried them on my Denon HT receiver, using the small setting, but I could hear that XO too much and they were much smoother with it running full range. I can't wait to see what they sound like with a good high pass filter. I have a feeling I'm going to like them better than my FE206's with the helper woofer.
__________________
Everyone has a photographic memory. It's just that most are out of film. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| fullrange for OB? | nicoch58 | Full Range | 1 | 11th February 2008 08:36 PM |
| mostly fullrange | tomtt | Full Range | 1 | 25th April 2006 01:04 PM |
| Fullrange for me? | bjackson | Full Range | 13 | 31st August 2005 10:55 PM |
| fullrange | tomtt | Full Range | 6 | 12th July 2005 03:11 AM |
| RCF fullrange | Ahmad_tbp | Full Range | 0 | 21st May 2005 06:13 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08865 seconds (75.33% PHP - 24.67% MySQL) with 10 queries |