|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
So has anyone had a chance to play with these yet? If yes, do you think the FS-2B is worth the roughly $2400 USD a pair?
Noidster
__________________
"Mmmmm......Beeeer" |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: British Antarctic Territory
|
The AERs are widely well-regarded.
"Worth it?" That's for the individual to decide. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Herts
|
Hmm, I'd say...No
Granted, I don't own/haven't heard them, but what exactly is the difference between them and X brand $50/$100 Full Range Driver? Other than bling-blingism, I doubt the fr is significantly flatter in response, so where does your money go exactly? I think once you get beyond a certain price point full range drivers as a whole become the limiting factor, rather than the pitching of this driver against that. Some people just have too much money to play with |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Clifton Park, NY
|
I have wondered about these drivers (and AER drivers) also.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Herts
|
Quote:
Could you please elaborate on how the Lowthers were significantly better than the Fostex drivers?. Is it just a subjective opinion or have you done controlled objective tests?(frequency response, impulse response etc). I'm not doubting that the Lowthers could be better than X model Fostex driver, but when the price of the Lowthers is 6/7 times that of the Fostex, are you getting 6/7 times the performance? Personally, I feel there's a lot of merit in full range drivers, but dropping such an amount of money on them is possibly a bit mislead, because I don't believe the performance gains could be great enough to justify the outlay. Of course, everyone has differing opinions, but if I had that amount of money to blow, I'd be looking at a 3, maybe 4-way. Properly implemented, I think it'd bring improvements of a much greater magnitude in dynamics/accuracy/detail in comparison to a single driver ££££ setup. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||||
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Clifton Park, NY
|
Quote:
Quote:
I have played my Lowther speakers for myself, family, and friends and done specific one against one testing between similar ML TL designs with the Fostex FE-208 Sigma and the Lowther DX2 drivers. Everybody agreed that the Lowther DX2 was a better sounding speaker. If you read my Project #4 write-up you can see how I tested and what my 12 year old son had to say. Draw your own conclusions. I have also heard my Lowther DX3 in the same environment as a few other DIY projects. Each had their own set of strengths and weaknesses and at the end of the day I liked the Lowthers better. My opinion and personal taste. Quote:
Quote:
So the questions is, can you buy a pair of woofers, a pair of midranges, and a pair of tweeters plus the crossover parts to build a three way for less that will be competitive performance wise. Before I became interested in full range I built a Focal two way TL which cost about $450 plus wood. Compared to the Lowther DX3, which I compared directly, the bass and the very top were a bit better but the Lowther killed it across the rest of the audio spectrum. Before this I built a Focal three way which cost about $1250 plus wood but was long gone before the Lowthers arrived. Lived with that system for almost 10 years and I believe it would have produced the same conclusions in a one for one comparision, the crossover was a real pain on that design. I guess that my point is as follows, I am not convinced that a top quality three way using premium drivers and crossovers is going to be cheaper then a Lowther full range system. I think premium drivers are required to equal the Lowthers. In fact, I bet when you get all done, the Lowther drivers will be very cost competitive. But again, you set the standard and your opinion is what really matters. I can only relate my experiences. |
||||
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
|
Quote:
If they do something spectacular for your ears, that no other driver does, then yeah, IMO, they would be worth it |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Quote:
Not me, but from a materials/construction POV they don't appear that pricey to me. Consider that in 1954 the studio monitor driver standard was the costly to manufacture Altec 604C, which sold for $165. Using this inflation calculator: http://inflationdata.com/inflation/I...Calculator.asp I get ~$2079/pr, so considering that I believe the FS-2B is even more labor intensive to manufacture and made in much smaller quantities, $2400 seems almost a bargain to me. For it to be a reasonable price to me from a performance POV it would have to clearly outperform a good compression driver, which I don't see happening due to the physics of the situation. That said, for those folks that prefer FR loaded systems, the ~exponential increase in price with increasing resolution (assuming the driver actually delivers) is worth it IMO if you can/want to afford it since it's by far the weakest link in the audio chain. GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
They also build the AER MK1 which is cheaper and is used in the Lamhorn 1.8.
http://www.rlacoustique.com/aer.htm I assume it is an american dealer and they sell the MK1 so ask them for the 2B. But I don't see that much difference between the 2B and the MK1, they have very close construction methods so maybe the MK1 is a better bargain. For sure, if I had the money I'd choose either the AER MK1 or some Fostex F200A (a little cheaper) In europe the MK1 is sold 600€ so 1200€ a pair. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Clifton Park, NY
|
I don't believe that AER is the same company. I believe that Fullrange-Speakers split from AER on unfriendly terms.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| designing a sub and fullrange box for several speakers... | mulletdude | Subwoofers | 116 | 17th July 2009 04:31 AM |
| Coral fullrange speakers 12" | cypher | Full Range | 13 | 1st April 2009 05:58 PM |
| fullrange speakers for sale | adason | Swap Meet | 4 | 11th June 2006 07:00 PM |
| Tubes and fullrange speakers! | barossi | Swap Meet | 1 | 16th November 2004 04:13 PM |
| need help : fullrange speakers project | punk | Multi-Way | 24 | 28th February 2003 08:47 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13026 seconds (84.18% PHP - 15.82% MySQL) with 11 queries |