Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Full Range

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 31st August 2005, 12:46 AM   #1
congari is offline congari  Viet Nam
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hanoi Vietnam
Default FE206E or FE168EZ?

I am listening a pair of BLH FE206E.
May I have lower bass with FE168EZ or FE108EZ? Need your advises.
Thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st August 2005, 07:42 AM   #2
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 5
Default Re: FE206E or FE168EZ?

Quote:
Originally posted by congari
I am listening a pair of BLH FE206E.
May I have lower bass with FE168EZ or FE108EZ? Need your advises.
Thanks
I doubt that either of the smaller drivers will go lower, but it is hard to best the 108 in the critical midrange.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st August 2005, 01:25 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ohio
I have the 168 and it can go pretty darn low. However, I've only heard it in folded pipes, never in a horn. In the Supravox folded pipe I heard, I was blown away by the bass it offers. However, I'm sure it wouldn't have the efficiency of a horn.

Looking at the 168 vs. the 108, I'm sure the 168 can offer more bass. If you look at the Fostex graphs for the 208E Sigma and the 168, there really isn't that much difference on the low end.

However, Dave may be right in that the 108 may have an edge in the mids. I've also read that the 208 has an amazing midrange, and I feel the 168 is excellent as well. Depending on your wants and needs, I don't think you'd be disappointed with any of the Sigma drivers.
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st August 2005, 05:07 PM   #4
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 5
Quote:
Originally posted by one1speed
Depending on your wants and needs, I don't think you'd be disappointed with any of the drivers.
ditto
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd September 2005, 02:06 AM   #5
congari is offline congari  Viet Nam
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hanoi Vietnam
Thanks all
I am looking for lower bass but it seem that Fostex EZ line is super in mid range.
I am now happy with mid of FE206E. Could u please point out differences in mid range between 206e and 168EZ ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd September 2005, 02:59 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: BrisVegas
Hi one1speed

I am thinking of using the 168 in the rec BLH cabs. What did you decide to do with your 168? You seemed a little dissatisfied with it in a couple of posts - was it bass and/or dynamics? I am not sure what your needs and wants are... so it is difficult to place your comments in context.

Care to share your current thoughts and feelings on this driver, along with system and musical preferences. This might give congari and myself a little more understanding of the driver in general.

Kind regards, Raymond
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd September 2005, 05:29 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ohio
I'll try to help. The issues with this driver mostly are with my box design, with the real issue being that I haven't had time to build a decent, proper box. I currently have them crammed into some of TC's Bigger is Better boxes. I say they aren't correct, as they barely fit. Now if I were to take the design and enlarge the cross section, I think we'd have something. As I've mentioned many times, and above, I have heard these in the Supravox folded pipe and they sounded amazing. I would have sworn there was a sub in the room. These were driven by a high end 300B amp and a cheaper CD player. Wow.

TC thinks the 168 is a great compromise driver, meaning you won't quite get the bass of a larger driver, but there is plenty, and you really don't need a tweeter. TC also recommended the larger horn, the D-37 I believe, (don't quote me on that just yet) over the recommended horn. It's larger and he said it sounds amazing. I have read some differing opinions, as it seems that was designed for the special addition of that driver with the larger magnet. However, something to consider.

As for my system, when I first got them, I had built the Welborne 300Bs. Very nice, amazing mids and such, but I felt I was missing something on top. So, I had started to ask around about a possible tweeter. Then I came across a deal on an early addition of the Audio Zone gainclone amp. Holy crap! This totally changed the sound of the system. This is the first non-tube amp I have heard that had a soundstage that wasn't flat compared to tubes, very involving. It also had considerably more top-end extension and more bass extension.

I've been very happy with this amp and these drivers. I've had some decent speakers in the past from Meadowlark, NHT, Audio Physic and I think these are amazing.

Sorry, short on time right know and I can't seem to find time to finish this. I hope this helps.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd September 2005, 09:07 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: BrisVegas
Hi again one1speed

Thanks muchly for taking the time to respond to my questions. The info you have provided certainly helps me understand this driver a little a better.

I have read many of your other posts, along with those from TC, amongst others, which seem to indicate that the 168 is probably the best all-round compromise of the ESigmas. I am currently considering this driver, as well as the Supravox 215RTF (+ tweet) and the decidedly non-full range driver Radian coaxials: all have different "sound" and I can not hear any in advance. The 168 may win out on grounds of simplicity / ease of implementation and <$$$.

Anyhow, enough rambling. I have two questions that hopefully will consume little of your time. 1) which Supravox TQWT - IIRC it was one of the designs for a Supravox 8" driver? 2) Is the music you listen to through the driver a little more demanding than simple acoustic music? I have reasonably diverse tastes - though have no craving for weighty bass.

Thank you again for taking the time to respond - it is appreciated. Raymond
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd September 2005, 09:16 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ohio
Raymond

I'll do the best I can. Just thought I'd check in before I ran out the door.

First, which box design, follow this link: http://www.supravox.fr/kits.htm

Then, scroll down to TQWT, it's the last in that catagory.

As for the music, I tend to listen to a pretty diverse selection as well, though often acoustic and jazz. I will throw on a little hip hop on occasion, not much on heavy metal, but some more alternative stuff. As long as it doesn't get overly complicated, I think the driver does well. Any single driver trying to produce the full spectrum can begin to fall flat if they are trying to do too much. Also note that I usually don't crank them. I'll turn them up a bit, no question. But, I'm not trying to go deaf listening to them.

Hope this helps. I'm off the board until next week. Cheers!
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd September 2005, 11:55 PM   #10
robertG is offline robertG  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Montreal
Default 168 vs 108

I had both in all kinds of BLH design, and in my very humble opinion, if the listening room is smallish, the FE108 is a clear winner.

I had a 108 pair that I sold for a 168 pair, that I sold again to get a new pair of 108...

There is not much difference in the bottom end (relative to room size, as always), but the mids and highs are much more smooth in the 108.

So, if you like bass, you will end up using a sub with the 168, same with the 108. But given the 108 smoothness, it's a no brainer.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Enclosures for FE168EZ astrodog Full Range 2 20th July 2008 02:03 AM
WTB: Fostex FE168EZ Sigmas Glowbug Swap Meet 0 21st February 2007 11:04 PM
FE108EZ and FE168EZ LilMik Full Range 21 21st September 2006 08:37 AM
FE168EZ Open Baffle audioferret Multi-Way 5 29th November 2005 07:17 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:29 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2