diyAudio

diyAudio (http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/)
-   Full Range (http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/full-range/)
-   -   CSS FR125S for center channel ? (http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/full-range/62893-css-fr125s-center-channel.html)

MCH 21st August 2005 03:59 PM

CSS FR125S for center channel ?
 
I built a pair of these in the Onken cab (designed by Dave). I've listened to them for a couple of days so far. I'm trying to compare them to my ARdiy's. So far I can't hear anything that really jumps out at me. The only thing that I think is a little different is less sibilance in some female vocals. I'll listen to them for a couple of weeks and then switch back to my ARdiy's. Usually I find this is when the ear notices the difference the most. I find I definitely need my subwoofer to augment the bass. Without the subwoofer the sound is just too flat for my taste.

On to my question. If I build a center channel and utilize say 3 speakers to get a final 8ohm configuration; do I connect it as a pair of parrallels connected to one in series? If so, is the one that is connected in series to the parrallel pair, connected to the positive terminal of one speaker and the negative terminal of the other (in the parallel pair)?

After listening to them, I'll finish them (paint) and post a pic.

Bas Horneman 21st August 2005 04:29 PM

Can't wait to get mine! What amps are you driving them with, if I may ask?

Regards,
Bas

MCH 21st August 2005 04:50 PM

I'm using a Panasonic SA-XR50 digital receiver. I like this receiver a lot. Great for digital listening! The analog out (for SACD) though, is not that good.

Landroval 21st August 2005 04:53 PM

Re: CSS FR125S for center channel ?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by MCH
I find I definitely need my subwoofer to augment the bass. Without the subwoofer the sound is just too flat for my taste.
How did you place the speakers? If they're far away from walls, you could try a simple BSC-circuit.

morbo 21st August 2005 06:44 PM

Why would you use 3 of them for a center channel? I use 1 WR125 and it works just fine, its crossed at 100hz using the receiver's bass management. I find it anchors voices etc to the center of the screen very well, much better than the sideways MTM centers I've heard before.

MCH 22nd August 2005 03:01 AM

"Why would you use 3 of them for a center channel? "

Good question. I suppose I'm use to center channels in the MTM configuration, I find it difficult to envision 1 speaker for that function. It certainly is more econmical with 1 speaker. I like the look of the 3 configuration. Is this a bad idea for sound? I see lots of line arrays (vertical) that seem to be well thought of. But as for the wiring aspect, is my line of thinking correct?

"How did you place the speakers?"

I have the speakers about 3+ feet from rear and side walls. I'm not saying that there is no bass, just prefer more bass than what is put out by these speakers. Plus I think they would be more efficient (the mid frequencies would be better served) if the lower frequencies were removed from their workload. Personally I feel that most (if not all) systems could utilize a good subwoofer. A subwoofer indepentently is much more versatile, efficient and controllable to suit individual setups. But that is just my personal preferences.

madscience 22nd August 2005 07:39 AM

I concur with MCH. A subwoofer has more than just one benefit. I built a sealed sub with an active Linkwitz/Riley crossover @ 85 Hz to make up for the lack of low end of my Tannoy Reveal monitors. I plugged the ports of the Tannoys and let me tell you: This is the way to go. I invited a friend over to my house who has a lot of experience with professional recording and found my system to be up to par with the multi-thousand dollar system in his pro studio in terms of sound quality. To sum up the benefits of a sub:

- extended bass
- bass reflex can be avoided
- less movement of the cones of the main speakers, thus better resolution
- room gain can easily be compensated for (provided you can adjust the volume of your amplifiers separately)

By the way, I built a sub amp basend on the LM3886 which I highly recommend for bass if you don't need a lot of power.

Landroval 22nd August 2005 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MCH
"Why would you use 3 of them for a center channel? "

Good question. I suppose I'm use to center channels in the MTM configuration, I find it difficult to envision 1 speaker for that function. It certainly is more econmical with 1 speaker. I like the look of the 3 configuration. Is this a bad idea for sound? I see lots of line arrays (vertical) that seem to be well thought of. But as for the wiring aspect, is my line of thinking correct?

I've always hated the horizontal MTMs. The combfilter effect is very annoying when you move away form the centerline, and I really cant see any benefits in using that config.

If you MUST have an MTM, then I recommend you cut all but the lowest frequencies from the two side drivers and let the center one take care of the mids and highs. You could put the center one in a small closed 3 litre chamber and the two side drivers in a ~10 litre 50Hz reflex with 2nd order lowpass at 100Hz. Or something similar. This way you would actually benefit from the extra drivers.

morbo 22nd August 2005 03:45 PM

I don't think a horizontal array works the same way as a vertical array at all, and an array of 4.5" drivers running fullrange will run into combing problems. If anything, do what was suggested above and use 2 wr and 1 fr, rolling off the wrs to match baffle step. Really though this compromises the whole idea of a fullrange driver with no crossover to get in the way. I think that with a typical 100hz home theater receiver highpass, and a ported box tuned slightly below the HP frequency, you would have plenty of output from one driver, with much better coherency. Unless of course you have a huge room or listen at extremely loud levels.

Landroval 22nd August 2005 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by morbo
If anything, do what was suggested above and use 2 wr and 1 fr, rolling off the wrs to match baffle step. Really though this compromises the whole idea of a fullrange driver with no crossover to get in the way.
The FR doesn't need any x-over in a small closed box. Only the the two WRs should have something to cut the higher frequencies.

Quote:

Originally posted by morbo
I think that with a typical 100hz home theater receiver highpass, and a ported box tuned slightly below the HP frequency, you would have plenty of output from one driver, with much better coherency. Unless of course you have a huge room or listen at extremely loud levels.
I agree. And if you need more power than one FR can give, you should look at real bass drivers to go with it. One FR with x amount of Extremis 6.8 would be one solution for loud listening levels.


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:20 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2