Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Full Range
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 31st July 2005, 08:50 AM   #21
Nardis is offline Nardis  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: London
I'd like to join in the praise for GM's 48" MLTL – congratulations GM and many thanks. I built mine in pentagonal columns which look good (or will when they're painted) and sound superb. They have a high WAF too. If you have access to a reasonable table saw, the pentagon is a possibility. The panels are narrow and the front of the baffle only 155mm (just over 6”) wide.

However I have added a Fountek JP3 ribbon, carried over from earlier mini-monitors based on Jim Griffin’s design. I know there are disagreements about the JX92’s top end, but I do find that the ribbon makes a big difference to orchestral strings.

Xover is first order at just over 6k, and I use them against a wall. A friend brought round a Behringer and they measured pretty flat on it, with bass into the mid 30s

I find the design great on small group jazz (my main listening). The bass is fast and my ageing REL Strata won’t quite integrate. I miss the sub on orchestral music, which really needs a bit more weight at the bottom end.

I’m interested in the comments about power. Mine are running off a Leak Stereo 20. I have another Leak and am planning to bi-amp, using one channel of each amp to drive the JX92 and the other to drive the ribbon. It will be interesting to see if this improves the bass weight.
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st July 2005, 09:25 AM   #22
soongsc is offline soongsc  Taiwan
diyAudio Member
 
soongsc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Taiwan
Quote:
Originally posted by Nardis
I'd like to join in the praise for GM's 48" MLTL ?congratulations GM and many thanks. I built mine in pentagonal columns which look good (or will when they're painted) and sound superb. They have a high WAF too. If you have access to a reasonable table saw, the pentagon is a possibility. The panels are narrow and the front of the baffle only 155mm (just over 6? wide.

However I have added a Fountek JP3 ribbon, carried over from earlier mini-monitors based on Jim Griffin’s design. I know there are disagreements about the JX92’s top end, but I do find that the ribbon makes a big difference to orchestral strings.

Xover is first order at just over 6k, and I use them against a wall. A friend brought round a Behringer and they measured pretty flat on it, with bass into the mid 30s

I find the design great on small group jazz (my main listening). The bass is fast and my ageing REL Strata won’t quite integrate. I miss the sub on orchestral music, which really needs a bit more weight at the bottom end.

I’m interested in the comments about power. Mine are running off a Leak Stereo 20. I have another Leak and am planning to bi-amp, using one channel of each amp to drive the JX92 and the other to drive the ribbon. It will be interesting to see if this improves the bass weight.
There are some good and some bads about adding a tweeter to full range drivers, that's why we see these disagreements. Having played around with full range drivers and listened to them for over 20 years, we came up with a structure that we refer to as the FleXoNotch so that it was easier to tune the response to individual taste. It is posted in this forum and please feel free to use it for personal use if it helps. You will have the flexibility to adjust the balance among the high, mid, and low to different extents.
__________________
Hear the real thing!
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st August 2005, 04:35 AM   #23
el`Ol is offline el`Ol  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bavarian Forest
Open baffle speakers are good in reproducing the large space of a big orchestra, but for the big drums you need a sub. Drivers without whizzers reproduce voices slightly better than those with. My absolute favorite would be the Supravox 165 with field coil (€€€).
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st August 2005, 06:17 AM   #24
soongsc is offline soongsc  Taiwan
diyAudio Member
 
soongsc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Taiwan
Quote:
Originally posted by el`Ol
Open baffle speakers are good in reproducing the large space of a big orchestra, but for the big drums you need a sub. Drivers without whizzers reproduce voices slightly better than those with. My absolute favorite would be the Supravox 165 with field coil (€€€).
Open baffles need to be placed further way from the back wall due to the strong sounds comming out the back.
__________________
Hear the real thing!
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2005, 09:03 AM   #25
Jaime is offline Jaime  Uruguay
diyAudio Member
 
Jaime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Montevideo
Default I believe that Nelson Pass is right but...

Originally posted by Nelson Pass

" That is pretty much my experience - Full range drivers are at their
best with simple material, and when you get into the dynamics
and complexity of a full orchestra, they are not as satisfactory
as multi-driver setups".

I believe that Nelson Pass is right, but I do not understand the reason.

I have FE108 horns and they work very well with pianos, guitars, voices, ensambles...... But during the 7th of Beethoven there are parts that do not sound good.

I believe that the driver is very small...!!!
Now, I am constructing new horns with the FE168EZ.
But, If Nelson Pass is right, this it will not solve the problem.

I have seen the Horning Perikles, using a Lowthers wide range and a supertweeter and bass woofer. What happens in this case? There is confusion also?

Best regards.
Jaime
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2005, 10:58 AM   #26
soongsc is offline soongsc  Taiwan
diyAudio Member
 
soongsc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Taiwan
Default Re: I believe that Nelson Pass is right but...

Quote:
Originally posted by Jaime
Originally posted by Nelson Pass

" That is pretty much my experience - Full range drivers are at their
best with simple material, and when you get into the dynamics
and complexity of a full orchestra, they are not as satisfactory
as multi-driver setups".

I believe that Nelson Pass is right, but I do not understand the reason.

I have FE108 horns and they work very well with pianos, guitars, voices, ensambles...... But during the 7th of Beethoven there are parts that do not sound good.

I believe that the driver is very small...!!!
Now, I am constructing new horns with the FE168EZ.
But, If Nelson Pass is right, this it will not solve the problem.

I have seen the Horning Perikles, using a Lowthers wide range and a supertweeter and bass woofer. What happens in this case? There is confusion also?

Best regards.
Jaime
There are actually a few issues related with this.

First is the the dynamic range. Do not get this mixed up with sensitivity as normally shown in the specs. If the driver does not have good resolution, then you will tend to turn up the volume to hear the details, what this will cause is you quickly hit the power limits of the driver making the music sound loud but compressed. If the driver has good resolution, then you will not need to turn the volume up so much. In a full orchestra, each instrument is at a lower level. So when you start to turn up the volume, you start reaching the dynamic range limit.

Second is the driver characteristics. If you look at the Foxtex curves. Notice that the impedance curve is not so smooth, and the FR also has some peaks and valleys. The things they don't show is phase of the FR or phase of impedance. Non-smoothness in the impedance curves and FR curves concurrently with the impedance curves will reveal cone resonances and phase shifts. In simple musical instruments, phase will make the instrument sound somewhat different, but not so bad. If you have complicated instruments playing together, the ear can no longer distiguish the individual instruments, and the total music will soound a bit noisy and compressed.
Attached Images
File Type: gif fostex28.gif (9.3 KB, 499 views)
__________________
Hear the real thing!
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2005, 11:06 AM   #27
el`Ol is offline el`Ol  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bavarian Forest
I believe that the larger part of the problem is that high efficiency speakers are mostly driven by very non-linear triode or MOSFET amps. My Ciares don`t lose their detail resolution in complex material on my Panasonic digital receiver.
I once listened to a fullranger at an Antique Sound Lab single-ended amp that could be switched between triode and pentode mode and the difference was immense in complex orchestra material.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2005, 11:29 AM   #28
soongsc is offline soongsc  Taiwan
diyAudio Member
 
soongsc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Taiwan
Quote:
Originally posted by el`Ol
I believe that the larger part of the problem is that high efficiency speakers are mostly driven by very non-linear triode or MOSFET amps. My Ciares don`t lose their detail resolution in complex material on my Panasonic digital receiver.
I once listened to a fullranger at an Antique Sound Lab single-ended amp that could be switched between triode and pentode mode and the difference was immense in complex orchestra material.
That may be true, but it would have the same effects regardless full range or multi-way. Wouldn't it?
__________________
Hear the real thing!
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2005, 02:15 PM   #29
el`Ol is offline el`Ol  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bavarian Forest
Quote:
Originally posted by soongsc


That may be true, but it would have the same effects regardless full range or multi-way. Wouldn't it?

Yes, we would have to test a high efficiency multi-way system, horns also distort, and there are not so many without horns.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2005, 05:38 PM   #30
Jaime is offline Jaime  Uruguay
diyAudio Member
 
Jaime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Montevideo
But Nelson Pass talks about full range (and not horns) comparing with mutiway systems. A very good driver (Fostex F120A for example), would not work well in a complex situation?
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Full range driver & enclosure selection help CrookedChris Full Range 36 26th August 2009 10:59 PM
can I add additional Full range driver to my enclosure shuggi67 Full Range 6 2nd August 2009 04:45 AM
full range driver array design Salsero Full Range 0 24th November 2005 03:04 PM
Possibly most ridiculous full range enclosure design w1ntermute0 Full Range 3 8th August 2005 01:19 AM
Driver placement & enclosure design help DPK Multi-Way 1 16th June 2005 08:37 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:26 PM.

Page generated in 0.13340 seconds (79.44% PHP - 20.56% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio