|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hong Kong
|
I have built the officially recommended back loaded horn enclosure for my Fostex FE166E drivers. I have placed sound aborbants and sand into it to tune the sound. I found that the sound changes a lot upon changing the amount of materials placed in it but I don't think it is the right sound this driver should produce.
The mid-high frequencies disperse and become muddy when the enclosure is empty. When there is sound absorbant just behide the driver, mid-high dispersion problem is improved a lot. However, the overall sound is still not clear. I started filling sand to where the official datasheet told me(the canal below the driver). It seems to be optimum when the sand is of a certain volume but the sound is still slow, especially the bass.Is it the "right" sound from a BLHed FE166E? Is there any better tuning recommeded? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
The one and only
|
Try varying the density of the stuffing just behind the driver.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
|
There's no right or wrong answer here sadly. I suspect you're just going to have to experiment until you hit on the sound you like. I'm a little surprised you're finding the bass slow though. A few general questions / points to suggest.
Firstly, how long have you had the drivers? The FE166E takes around 300 hours before giving its best in my opinion. (unlike cables, caps etc, drivers do require break-in time.) Next question -is the horn exactly as per the Fostex plans? I've known people have problems when they rounded off all the 'nasty' right-angles inside the cabinets, which is a big mistake -they're part of the design. Third question: how are they positioned in your room -against the wall, in corners or pulled out? Fourth; how are they coupled to the floor? If you've put spikes on them, try removing them, and using a large quantity of Blu-Tak or children's play-dough or something like those to completly cover the base, and then stand them on a couple of paving-slabs (you can always pretty them up later with some veneer etc, or splash out on some marble if you're feeling rich). This makes a HUGE difference to any speaker, particularly in terms of improving the bass-weight and general claity. Spikes are generally not A Good Idea in my view -you've instantly created an open acoustic cavity under the speaker, which is exactly the reverse of what you need. Best & good luck Scott |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: dkm
|
Quote:
Thats correct they have to burn in for a long time I am playing with the Fostex FE 167 E and after 150 hours playing the sound improved.. are you using a bsc network ??
__________________
There is NoBox like NoBox |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Denver, CO
|
Did you use birch or mdf? I used birch and took the minimalist approach to deadening - plumber's putty on the basket and wool felt on the magnet. I like the sound, but I did several months of OB break-in while slowly building the cabinets. From the wording on the instructions I didn't get the feeling that they were recommending deadening as much as saying that if you felt you must do so, do it here and there. Figured I could always re-open them to insert more, but I haven't felt a need.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hong Kong
|
Quote:
Quote:
2. It is exactly that plan. Plywood is used except that the interior is lightly painted in case there is mould grown. 3. Both of the speakers are placed 1 feet in front of the back wall. One of them is a half feet away from the side wall and the other is 3 feets from the other side wall. 4. I did put spikes under the speakers. Before that, I cut some bouncing balls into half-spheres and used them as legs. Real spikes sounded better. I am removing the spikes and listening. I will report the result later. The materials under the base that you mentioned is not avaliable to me. I think I will try using some magazines first. |
||
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hong Kong
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Wisconsin
|
Quote:
http://www.t-linespeakers.org/tech/b...intro-bds.html Joe |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
The problem may be your room if you now have bass that was lacking before, and now it sounds muddy. Give them a listen outside with only a rear wall boundary. The room is often the most overlooked item but IMHO is one of the most important factors in obtaining good sound.
__________________
Everyone has a photographic memory. It's just that most are out of film. |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
The one and only
|
Quote:
don't need BSC as such, often benefit from some of this type of correction. The simple truth is that a lot of them have a hot and/or peaky upper mid and top end that is improved through step attenuation. The FE166E is not a big offender in this area, though.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FE166e used only above 200hz............. | norman bates | Full Range | 22 | 26th March 2009 11:10 PM |
| FE166E in BK-16 kit? | G | Full Range | 0 | 27th April 2007 06:54 AM |
| FE166E in dipoles | xstephanx | Full Range | 2 | 14th June 2006 05:55 PM |
| FE166E-SR rec horns | slappomatt | Full Range | 20 | 14th November 2005 04:43 PM |
| Fe166e Qwfptl | gpsmithii | Full Range | 16 | 30th April 2005 09:45 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |