Fostex FE126 vs. FE127: the sound - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Full Range

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 18th April 2005, 09:04 PM   #1
Juspur is offline Juspur  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Near Copenhagen
Default Fostex fe126 vs. fe127: the sound

Hi DIY'ers.
I've played around with both the fe126 and the fe127 for a few hundred hours (break-in) in 10.5 liter BR with various port lengths and notch filters - this is my general experiences (hope they are useful):

fe126: this is the "sharp knife" - extremely detailed, dynamic - engaging - and causing listening fatigue for most people. But I can't listen passively - they drag me into the music. Playing with notch filters only results in a more boring sound, IMHO. This is a 100% monitor, but with engagement - the music pops out of the speaker with lots of air. The sound is although on the lean side: instruments don't have their natural "body" - but start and roll off a little too fast.

Best performance: nothing worthy below 100 Hz. I consider mating them with a bandpass sub (=fullrange without any passive components).

fe127: "the true speaker" - instruments and voices do have a natural "body". In a 15 liter BR, f0 to 70 Hz, f3 at 59 Hz. You can easily listen to the fe127 without listening fatigue - the sound is delicious - but a bit too polished in my opinion (not as involving as the fe126).

Best performance: 15 liter BR.


Remember: both speakers are very revealing, meaning you have to be aware of proper matching (amp, cables etc.). I've experienced very different results, just changing the signal cable.

I hope the above can help you decide which driver to use. What's your experience with fe1266/fe127?

Best regards
Jesper/www.innowatt.dk
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2005, 09:34 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Timn8ter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Unless you need the magnetic shielding of the FE127E the FE126E is going to be the better performer, however, because of the rising frequency response it's going to need more than a standard BR. Probably best in a rear-loaded horn, second choice would be a transmission line. The FE127E would also benefit from use in a transmission line rather than a BR.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2005, 11:28 PM   #3
ScottG is offline ScottG  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: US
Default Re: Fostex fe126 vs. fe127: the sound

Quote:
Originally posted by Juspur
Hi DIY'ers.
causing listening fatigue for most people.. The sound is although on the lean side: instruments don't have their natural "body" - but start and roll off a little too fast.
imaging "body" has a lot to due with the amp used, in particular what the output impeadance is (though freq. extension is also a "culprit"). Additionally, output impeadance and the high freq. rising response is likely the cause of listener fatigue.

for the rising response just aim the drivers "inward" crossing in front of the listener aprox. 20 degrees off-axis (..this also provides other benefits).

for an increase in extension use a woofer or a powered sub.

a tube amp with 16 ohm output taps should do the trick for the impeadance issue (or a solid-state "current" amp).
__________________
perspective is everything
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th April 2005, 07:54 PM   #4
Juspur is offline Juspur  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Near Copenhagen
Default but the sound

Hello DIY'ers. You're probably right about the optimal setups - I don't know, since I haven't tried anything but BR's.

But how do you describe the sound, the sonic differences between fe126 and fe127?

Best regards
Jesper, www.innowatt.dk
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th April 2005, 09:24 PM   #5
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 5
Thanx for that... as Tim hi-lites thou the 126 would probably be less fatiguing in an enclosure that it is suited for (ie horn). Good to hear you enjoy them both thou.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th April 2005, 07:54 AM   #6
Juspur is offline Juspur  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Near Copenhagen
Default I try again

Okay, I'll try again: Have you actually HEARD the drivers (and in what configurations - BR, TL's or others - in comparative setups)?

How do you DESCRIBE the SOUND (saying the one is better than the other, doesn't actually help other people choosing a driver - if not the sound of the driver is described, i.e. lean, fat, varm, neutral...)

Best regards
Jesper
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th April 2005, 12:33 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Belfort
Send a message via MSN to youyoung21147
I heard the Fe127e of a friend in a TQWT and it is a very good speaker for the price. The sound is natural and detailed, and F3 is around 65Hz in this enclosure (better is possible).

I'd just say they are not linear enough in the high frequencies and the very light membrane used sounds a little agressive, it's a "paper sound". Hearing them for long is quite tiring.

Though it's a good speaker, it's not as detailed and neutral as my FX-120, but they cost much more !
__________________
Fostex F120A speaker pair for sale - 250 only !
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th April 2005, 10:28 PM   #8
The one and only
 
Nelson Pass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Having had the opportunity to try all four under identical
conditions, I find that the FE167 is to the FE166E as the FE166E
is to the FE166ES-R as the FE166ES-R is to the Lowther DX55.
There are other effects, but as the magnetic field gets a little
more powerful you notice this increase is detail and attack,
and under some circumstances it can be fatiguing, particularly
if the musical material is flawed.

  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Observations of FE127 VS. FE126 VS. FE103 and different enclosures Harderror Full Range 11 24th February 2012 02:00 PM
FS: NIB FOSTEX 4 X FE127 $39 each dhenryp Swap Meet 1 8th February 2012 02:52 AM
FOSTEX FE126 in Fostex BR Enclosure nafunga Full Range 3 29th July 2008 07:21 PM
Contemplating This Fostex Fe127 Project JimOfOakCreek Full Range 18 20th March 2008 02:13 PM
The Fostex FE126 Smokehouse Bob Full Range 8 17th February 2007 01:05 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:03 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2