Jensen folded horn with Audio Nirvana Classic 15 alnico?

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.

Attachments

  • 212422188_wczNj-X3.jpg
    212422188_wczNj-X3.jpg
    245.3 KB · Views: 414
What was said above. Not with a Q of nearly 1.0 and a 13.56ft^3 Vas. Even a big horn like the Imperial isn't going to be large enough for quality performance. Same arguments (more so) for the Super 15 AlNiCo.

Therefore, what would happen if having the classic 15 alnico on the Jenson folded horn cabinet? What will be getting affected due to the high qts?
 
(indicated to you that it has a weak motor at the asylum) - do you really want something twice the size of a refrigerator, large panels to brace, high driver cost with poor dynamics and a response as so? maybe its the most wonderful thing ever on an open baffle

JVGDidr.jpg
 
Therefore, what would happen if having the classic 15 alnico on the Jenson folded horn cabinet? What will be getting affected due to the high qts?

What Freddi shows. Large underdamped peaking in the mid - upper bass, limited output in the lower regions (< 100Hz). Dodgy sound, lots of complexity for not a lot of point.

What about modified this cabinet to fit the Classic 15 alnico as the horn cabinet is much larger?

Leaving aside off-axis radiation & various other practical considerations, it would be marginally better in alignment terms. Marginally. As in how some parts of the RMS Titanic are marginally less underwater than others. But this is not a driver that either benefits from or requires a back horn. It has a mass corner frequency of only 64.28Hz not including any series R present in the circuit.
 

GM

Member
Joined 2003
FWIW, 'gapping' [air leak between driver, baffle] a high Qt driver to 'bleed' off its 'Q-ness' can work, sometimes with/without damping material in the gap, though unless AkAbak can sim it, tuning is strictly empirically derived. Bruce Edgar did it on one of his FLH designs IIRC.

Designed from scratch, Klipsch Rebel concepts work well if there's some well constructed corners or even the DIY ones designed for the Klipschorn if a higher cutoff is acceptable.

GM
 
assuming JAG's model is ballpark and other than the horrific price for the Radian, the Radian CX parameters are a step in the right direction

2.83V 1Pi
TymIcE2.gif


for sensitivity comparison, here's a simulation of my little midbass horn with a $50 driver
plus Klipsch La Scala with K33

2.83V 1 Pi
pwCFBvz.jpg
 
Last edited:
True - but there have been serviceable 15CX for a lot less money. I tried to compare the Imperial with that Radian to a little Karlson with 1/10 the internal volume. The little K might work well with a subwoofer - it may not go as deep as this fudged sim indicates

Q6ZrsKJ.jpg
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.