Hi
Lately I have seen speakers, that their diaphragm material has these characters:
1) It is white
2) Unlike paper diaphragm, this one feels more like plastic
3) Unlike paper diaphragm, this one feels about 3 timer thicker than the thickness of a paper diaphragm
Examples of it, can be seen here:
A speaker from Pioneer - X-CM32BT-W:
Fluid Audio - FX8:
I noticed that the sound that these speakers give, is very pleasant, to my taste..
What material is it?
Thank you
Lately I have seen speakers, that their diaphragm material has these characters:
1) It is white
2) Unlike paper diaphragm, this one feels more like plastic
3) Unlike paper diaphragm, this one feels about 3 timer thicker than the thickness of a paper diaphragm
Examples of it, can be seen here:
A speaker from Pioneer - X-CM32BT-W:
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
Fluid Audio - FX8:
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
I noticed that the sound that these speakers give, is very pleasant, to my taste..
What material is it?
Thank you
When I touched it in the store, it felt hard, hard plastic - similar to the speaker in the first image..
Can you please tell me where is the description you found that mentions the diaphragm material?
Last edited:
Well here it is:
"The woofer is built around a composite paper cone"
Fluid Audio FX8 | Sound On Sound
"The woofer is built around a composite paper cone"
Fluid Audio FX8 | Sound On Sound
There's such a huge range of possible formulations / compositions and treatments of paper types, that the term itself is far too vague to be any predictor of sonic signature.
For example Fostex uses a quite different composite paper type on their FF- WK series than on the FE models, which will certainly contribute in part to their sound.
For example Fostex uses a quite different composite paper type on their FF- WK series than on the FE models, which will certainly contribute in part to their sound.
Agree with chrisB and add: you don´have X-ray eyes
... meaning: as described it´s a *composite* material, it may very well be a sandwich of an internal paper cone with an external, visible , polypropylene one.Of course you´ll only see the polypropylene from the outside
Both matrials have their unique advantages: paper is truely time tested, strong and light while polypropylene (original commercial brand: Bextrene) is self damping and low distortion.
To read more than you ever wanted to know about plastic cone materials:
http://www.almainternational.org/ya...cs/Plastic_Speaker_Cone_History.259103948.pdf
It's highly unlikely unless the driver is hundreds of years old. Most likely the paper has completely absorbed the composite. From my own tests I've also noted coated paper cones tend to sound quite relaxed. If you haven't, you should test out Vifa TC9FD. It has a coated paper cone and sounds very nice to me.
When searching in Parts Express for "TC9FD", it found 2 speakers, but not from a mfrr named "Vifa", but from "Peerless by Tymphany"..
Reading the description on the product page, it seems that the company changed name, from Vifa to Peerless..
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
BTW one is 4ohm and one is 8ohm,
Is it generally correct to say that when 2 models are identical besides the impedance,
then the higher impedance will give a better and deeper sound?
(of course we will match the amplifier for the 8ohm impedance)
Last edited:
Oh..
I based my information on this:
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
So it's not the same?
Where can the Vifa one be bought?
Yes,
it appears the first in the list, when listing Full Range drivers..
And I guess the default sort type ("Best Match") is done according to popularity (number of purchases of the item), so many people love it in addition to you..
Last edited:
Oh, I understand.
Oh OK..
But If you have a driver, that has 2 versions, one is 4ohm and ther other is 8ohm,
and everything else is really the same,
would it be correct to say that the 8ohm will sound better?
From your experience..
If that worries you then this can give you a heart attack
:
straight from: Patent US20040146176 - Paper-honeycomb-paper sandwich multi-layer loudspeaker cone structure - Google Patente
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
This is even worse, the Sony version:
Technics:
Last edited:
Amazing what ideas people come with for the diaphragm..
BTW:
there are about 10 different drivers in Parts Express that I want to try,
and since for each type I should mostlikely need a pair for trying,
it means that I should buy 20 drivers from them.
Do other people here have the same problem?
(is the solution simply to buy, even if we just try them and don't use 80% of them in the end?)
BTW:
I have a problem,
there are about 10 different drivers in Parts Express that I want to try,
and since for each type I should mostlikely need a pair for trying,
it means that I should buy 20 drivers from them.
Do other people here have the same problem?
(is the solution simply to buy, even if we just try them and don't use 80% of them in the end?)
Re the two "Vifa" drivers, don't forget that the TC9 that has many fans here has two variants- one with treated paper, and the other fibreglass. As similar as the rest of their respective constituent parts (rear spider, voice coil & former, front surround), and even cone profile might be - the material itself will definitely make a difference in sonic signatures.
Sounds like you're suffering from analysis paralysis- one solution is to throw many hundreds of dollars - or your local equivalent - and scores of construction hours at the problem, and buy one pair of every make and model of drivers on the ever lengthening list of suggestions freely offered, and build the most frequently recommended enclosures for each.
Or, if you've already heard a pair or two that you quite fancy, try to get a handle on how easy they would be to emulate. Whether simple and cheap single driver systems, or 3 -4 way systems, Open Baffles -whatever- you'll still find no shortage of advice here; nor likely universal consensus.
Sounds like you're suffering from analysis paralysis- one solution is to throw many hundreds of dollars - or your local equivalent - and scores of construction hours at the problem, and buy one pair of every make and model of drivers on the ever lengthening list of suggestions freely offered, and build the most frequently recommended enclosures for each.
Or, if you've already heard a pair or two that you quite fancy, try to get a handle on how easy they would be to emulate. Whether simple and cheap single driver systems, or 3 -4 way systems, Open Baffles -whatever- you'll still find no shortage of advice here; nor likely universal consensus.
I don't have a huge experience, but from the experience I have, I know that the sound that I prefer is paper over fiber glass.
So If I buy it I will buy the paper version.
Amazing diagnosis. You are good.
And it's not just in speaker drivers, unfortunately.
Well, I thought more about a simpler and easier version.
(to try them all, without a unique enclosure for each one. It's much faster, yet still requires spending the same amount of $ for the drivers)
I didn't understand this part:
"try to get a handle on how easy they would be to emulate."
What do you mean to emulate?
To make 1 kind of speaker sound like another kind of speaker?
(why not buy the other kind from the start?)
Last edited:
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.