The REAL reasons behind open baffles 4" or less having no bass ? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Full Range

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 17th April 2013, 07:57 PM   #1
aarvin2 is offline aarvin2  Mauritius
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Default The REAL reasons behind open baffles 4" or less having no bass ?

Hi guys I am very confused, I have read that the reason speakers need an enclosure is to prevent the low frequency waves coming from the front to interact with the low frequency waves(opposite phase) coming from the back and cancelling out.

Also that the quarter wavelength of the desired low frequency we would like to hit, must be smaller than one of the faces of the baffle.

The problem is that I made an experiment today and placed speakers (tang band 4" and a tang band 3" w3-1878) directly into the middle of a RW45 Rockwool pack (1200mm x 600mm x 400 mm).

The were no enhancement in bass, the only "sound" is one which is produced when all the holes behind the speakers are closed. You know, the boxy sound.

If that theory was really good, I believe all the low frequency waves coming from behind the speaker would be absorbed by this huge amount or rockwool, and that the waves coming from the front of the speaker would not be cancelled out.

But the sound was the same, no bass enhancement.


I think I must have done or understood something wrong and I would love to have some help.

Could anyone please explain why when a speaker plays on its own(without any enclosure) it produces low level of bass (sounds like a big roll off) ?

Many many thanks!
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2013, 08:04 PM   #2
xrk971 is online now xrk971  United States
diyAudio Member
 
xrk971's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Virginia
Bass enhancement in an enclosure comes from resonance either as a Helmholz resonator or as quarter wave / transmission line or a horn - all these methods require an output port. A sealed enclosure has no bass enhancement, it has very clean bass but is limited by the fs of the driver. This is similar to an open baffle. The bass you get will look very much like the manufacturers freq response curve. Any bass enhancement or 'gain' in bass comes from resonant amplification in an aero acoustic device.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2013, 08:25 PM   #3
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
 
Cal Weldon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Near Vancouver
You require something rigid to prevent the front wave and back wave from reaching one another. Damping material does little to absorb the lower frequency waves that are being cancelled when combined. Try a piece of wood and it will all become clear.

Damping material really only has value above what we think of as 'bass'. It helps prevent standing waves inside the cabinet and attenuates the 'midrange' frequencies that you don't want exiting the port.

Best not to use the 'enhancement' term here. It's got X answering a different question.
__________________
Next stop: Margaritaville
Some of Cal's stuff | Cal Weldon Consulting
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2013, 08:52 PM   #4
xrk971 is online now xrk971  United States
diyAudio Member
 
xrk971's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Virginia
Yes, Cal is right. In your case with a rock wool baffle you are getting worse than no bass enhancement but bass cancellation a negative gain effect. You can use even a sheet of cardboard or maybe foam core for the baffle to isolate the front and back waves. You won't get enhancement or gain but at least it won't be bass cancellation or loss.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2013, 02:24 PM   #5
aarvin2 is offline aarvin2  Mauritius
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by xrk971 View Post
Bass enhancement in an enclosure comes from resonance either as a Helmholz resonator or as quarter wave / transmission line or a horn - all these methods require an output port. A sealed enclosure has no bass enhancement, it has very clean bass but is limited by the fs of the driver. This is similar to an open baffle. The bass you get will look very much like the manufacturers freq response curve. Any bass enhancement or 'gain' in bass comes from resonant amplification in an aero acoustic device.
The problem is that what I hear doesn't come close to the frequency response graph of the manufacturer, in the sense that it seems to roll off way sooner (higher low mids). But 800Hz and more it is very representative of the graph.

I actually don't want bass enhancement but want it to sound like it it on the manufacturer's frequency graph.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2013, 03:49 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
tuxedocivic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Ladysmith, BC
Dipole will give a figure 8 polar pattern within the suitable pass band. Above the pass band they'll have a "ridged" polar response and below the pass band (bass) they'll have little to no output. The pass band is determined by the baffle width, which is typically very narrow or even baffleless in order to widen the pass band as much as possible. Are you listening directly on axis when you're experimenting? A microphone will help you understand what's happening here.

Can you explain more clearly what the problem is? The multiway forum may offer better explanations. Not many here do the open baffle thing. I'd love to give it a try someday, but I don't know much more about it than what I just typed.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2013, 06:00 PM   #7
aarvin2 is offline aarvin2  Mauritius
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by tuxedocivic View Post
Dipole will give a figure 8 polar pattern within the suitable pass band. Above the pass band they'll have a "ridged" polar response and below the pass band (bass) they'll have little to no output. The pass band is determined by the baffle width, which is typically very narrow or even baffleless in order to widen the pass band as much as possible. Are you listening directly on axis when you're experimenting? A microphone will help you understand what's happening here.

Can you explain more clearly what the problem is? The multiway forum may offer better explanations. Not many here do the open baffle thing. I'd love to give it a try someday, but I don't know much more about it than what I just typed.
I was indeed listening directly on axis

The problem is that people explain the lack of bass is due to low frequencies from the back interfering with frequencies coming from the front as they are out of phase.

But in my experiment where I placed the speaker in a big rockwool pack, which at this thickness and size have a huge absorption coefficient, and the result was as I explained in the original post.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2013, 06:07 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Bob Brines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hot Spring Village AR
The point that was being made is that rockwool or any other absorptive material will have the least effect on the BASS. At low frequencies, your rockwool pack is entirely transparent. You need to use a board.

Bob
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2013, 06:41 PM   #9
aarvin2 is offline aarvin2  Mauritius
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Brines View Post
The point that was being made is that rockwool or any other absorptive material will have the least effect on the BASS. At low frequencies, your rockwool pack is entirely transparent. You need to use a board.

Bob
Hi Bob, thank you for your insight, but Rockwool is used in studios to absorb low frequency resonances isn't it(and they are using relatively thinner panels), why wouldn't it work behind a speaker for example ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2013, 06:54 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Bob Brines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hot Spring Village AR
Rather than try to conduct a tutorial here, I suggest that you look into the coefficient of absorption of various materials. Start with http://www.bobgolds.com/AbsorptionCoefficients.htm
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
desktop TL with 3" driver (with real bass) Henkjan Full Range 60 6th July 2014 10:11 AM
Beer budget "Version" of $10,000+ Jamo Open Baffles sreten Multi-Way 216 13th March 2014 11:21 PM
"Real Life" Bass recordings gmikol Subwoofers 21 15th August 2006 03:39 PM
Project "Open Baffles" : NEED HELP ICARE Multi-Way 10 7th March 2003 02:03 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:59 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2