|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
|
Quote:
Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
|
I wonder if the Tang Band W8-1772 would work in this enclosure as well. Maybe Bjorn could run a sim for that. It would be nice to have an enclosure where the driver could be swapped in/out.
Thoughts on this? |
|
|
|
#53 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Western Massachusetts
|
Well this enclosure, being quarter wave resonant, would maintain that tune of 35 hz regardless of driver parameters. So if the driver handles "extreme tuning" as I believe Bjorn called it, than it should work. Some drivers require dampening from the enclosure, something that this enclosure design with its large volume and high density stuffing offers little of.
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Virginia
|
The MLTL generally likes moderate to high Qts parameter drivers, I think the 1772 is a low Qts high Bl driver designed more for BLH's. Easy enough to simulate and see though.
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
|
Good point, and I do love the simplicity of this design. I do not want to move to a BLH.
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Western Massachusetts
|
If you were to try the Tang Band W8-1808 it might work. It is very similar to the 1772 but with a higher Qts (along with some other parameters being different). I don't know if the TB drivers are really worth 4 times the price of the Betsy K though. For me, anyway, this is a build where I am trying to get the most out of a limited budget.
|
|
|
|
#57 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hot Spring Village AR
|
The W8-1772 works very well in a MLTL cabinet 40" tall and 75L net. The 1808 requires a 48" tall cabinet ant 100L net. I have avoided the 1808 because of the large cabinet it requires. Most users here choose to run the 1808 OB.
Bob |
|
|
|
#59 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
|
Yea, I need something with a high sensitivity. I will be using a SET amp so the BetsyK or TB W81772 are my choices right now.
|
|
|
|
#60 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Texas, USA
|
You don't want HD to do most of the cutting. I have yet to find a HD store where the blade on the panel saw wasn't dull. The nice veneer will be a mess. One might be better off spending a bit more and getting the 2x4 purebond sheets shipped to them. More veneer types available as well.
Quote:
__________________
I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| W3-881SI tabaq | kenrhodes | Full Range | 3 | 7th March 2012 11:14 PM |
| TABAQ bookshelf enclosure design | yljhao | Full Range | 34 | 24th December 2010 11:51 AM |
| Tall Corner TABAQ | Equilibrium | Full Range | 2 | 11th April 2010 10:46 PM |
| Tabaq to the future. | raypalmer | Multi-Way | 7 | 6th April 2009 03:59 AM |
| Folded TABAQ | BoomieMCT | Full Range | 3 | 7th July 2007 10:08 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |