Effects of "Horn-loading" FRD - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Full Range
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 25th October 2012, 06:37 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Default Effects of "Horn-loading" FRD

Hey guys n' gals,

I'm currently working on a top-secret project utilizing the buyout Tang Band W3-881SI. I've decided to use a sealed .05 cubic foot enclosure given the driver's high Qt and extremely limited Xmax. Through a lot of tape-on baffle testing and some input from my old lady, I've decided to rear-mount the driver. My question is in regards to the overall effect that rear mounting, plus using a 1/2" round over bit on the front baffle. I've essentially "horn loaded" the driver, however minimally. In testing I've noted that mounting the driver in this way had a different effect than I though it would. Instead of increasing off-axis response, the polar response became more beam-like. Perhaps this was due to the driver being recessed and the 1/2" radius not really horn loading the driver in a traditional sense?

Also, given the driver's rather poor sensitivity, would mounting the driver in this way provide a nominal increase in system sensitivity?


EDIT: Also - would mounting the driver in this way affect diffraction?

Last edited by EKwisnek; 25th October 2012 at 07:04 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th October 2012, 07:29 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Originally Posted by EKwisnek View Post
Instead of increasing off-axis response, the polar response became more beam-like.
In my opinion, you are hearing the predicted effect of a waveguide, that is, a narrowing of the radiation pattern into a smaller solid angle. Thus dispersion is not as wide. So it isn't serving your intended purpose, but that doesn't necessarily mean it sounds worse.

For example, the standard vintage Klipsch tweeter was found to sound and measure a bit worse when front-mounted, because the rear-mounting (which looks atrocious) actually left a little cushion of air that was just barely enough to suppress some bad behavior at its bottom end.

But not all wavelengths are affected equally by the shape of this "hole" you have, and thus you are almost imposing a random tone control on the driver's response. However, I wouldn't lose too much sleep over it, because whatever effect it has is probably dwarfed by the rest of the energy coming off the (presumably untreated) baffle.

So you might consider using a layer of thick (real) wool felt to attenuate the baffle's diffracted energy. That might end up having benefits far in excess of the (slightly?) reduced dispersion.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th October 2012, 07:35 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
you are almost imposing a random tone control on the driver's response
I don't currently have any plans for treating the baffle because it would ruin any plans I had for these being stealth mini-monitors upstairs (where real people live). I haven't really considered a BSC circuit at this point, but I'm concerned that this new "tone control" would already be coloring the response in an unpredictable way.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th October 2012, 10:28 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
It is in our nature, as audiophiles, to worry about all things great and small. But problems should be solved according to their magnitude.

If you need BSC, but choose to skip it, that would be orders of magnitude more significant than rear-mounting. Further, there will be gross distortions of the frequency response due to floor bounce, ceiling bounce, diffraction from that shiny audiophile stand, to say nothing of the grotesque distortions from room modes, which would make your hair stand on end should you choose to measure them.

But if you solve the problems according to their magnitude, you will sleep well at night!
  Reply With Quote


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Horn-loading the "new breed" of pro sound 6.5-8'' drivers Swedish Chef Multi-Way 62 9th February 2014 05:15 PM
New Effects Pedal Kit "The Trill Tremolo" from ModKitsDiy amplifiedparts Vendor's Bazaar 0 2nd September 2011 07:11 PM
What is "mass loading?" chrusion Subwoofers 8 15th January 2011 05:47 AM
"Optimal" output grid loading? solder slinger Tubes / Valves 0 19th October 2009 05:04 PM
Need Help Downloading "Passive Crossover" FRD!! kelticwizard Multi-Way 16 8th December 2002 10:39 PM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:40 PM.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2017 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2