|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
|
I am thinking of building the Mullard 3+3watt stereo amplifier and would welcome suggestions for suitable speakers either built or in kit form. The set up would be for an average sized lounge and listening to classical music without rocking the foundations!
My reading so far suggests i should look for speakers with above 90dB sensitivity and preferably 95dB. A further restriction is that the speakers should be 'domestically acceptable' which means small floor standing cabinets. I've spent hours surfing the net on this topic but am left in confusion. Any help greatly appreciated. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: So.Cal.
|
90 to 95 db sensitivity is a fairly wide range.
For reasonable volume levels with sufficient headroom, 90 db and 3W is little marginal. 93db speakers would be twice the volume with the same power compared to 90db, and 96db sensitivity would be 4 times the volume from the same wattage. Conversely, for a given volume level, 96db speakers will require 1/4 of the power that 90db speakers require. As a general rule of thumb, you'll find that larger drivers are more sensitive than smaller ones....and getting above about 95db sensitivity starts getting tough without horn loading, etc. Last edited by boywonder; 25th April 2012 at 01:49 PM. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: victoria BC
|
as boywonder remarked, that's a wide range of sensitivity to consider, and the constraint of "domestically acceptable" could well shorten the list of driver and enclosure size / type
the first that comes to mind would be FH3 with Fostex FE126E or Alpair7.3 (don't let the latter's specs dissuade you, it's far more "efficient" at delivering music into the room than the sensitivity number would suggest) Frugel-Horn Mk3 disclaimer: see signature line below another candidate might be the FF125WK in a "pensil-esque" MLTL
__________________
you don't really believe everything you think, do you? community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com commercial site planet10-HiFi |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: So.Cal.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Spain
|
Wild Burro Audio, The Betsy or The Betsy-K:
Wild Burro Audio Labs - Fullrange Speakers - The Betsy & Betsy-K Drivers Wild Burro Audio Labs - Fullrange Speaker Projects - Basic Open Baffle Design The Frugal-Horns Site -- High Performance, Low Cost DIY Horn Designs Happy days. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: victoria BC
|
I think the poster needs to qualify what the dimensional / design constraints of "domestically acceptable" means in his particular case before our "assistance" furthers his confusion
It might be a good idea to review a few of the build galleries with the domestic partner to test those limits - you could be surprised (just be sure to clear the late night browser history first)
__________________
you don't really believe everything you think, do you? community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com commercial site planet10-HiFi |
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
Toppsy is the flat-pak guy in the UK. He primarily does FH3, Chris' suggestion of these with FE126 is a good one. It is VERY popular with the small SE crowd. It can benefit from usable corners to help extend the bass. FH3 Picture Gallery dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Texas, USA
|
Where did you get this? 3dB needs twice the power, but is considered to be the minimum change in output that is "noticable". A 10dB change in SPL is considered to be "twice" as loud.
The Relationship of Voltage, Loudness, Power and Decibels There are other similar references. Quote:
__________________
I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now. |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: So.Cal.
|
Quote:
![]() Well, at least the sentence about power is correct...... Last edited by boywonder; 25th April 2012 at 07:35 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: victoria BC
|
Quote:
let's get back to the questions of xtaljo's "average sized lounge" and what would constitute "domestically acceptable" enclosure size / design even if on the room is larger end of the scale, I'd wager Kleinhorns or Experience Music 4 way FL horns might not qualify ![]() OK to be fair, even though reasonably efficient, these need more than 2 channels of amplification
__________________
you don't really believe everything you think, do you? community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com commercial site planet10-HiFi |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Suitable speakers | Roushon | Multi-Way | 37 | 11th September 2010 12:39 PM |
| How suitable is this tranformer for a Tube Amp Project? | seabass23 | Tubes / Valves | 13 | 31st March 2010 01:50 AM |
| Suitable tube pre-amp for Phase Linear 400? | AndrewF | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 22nd September 2008 01:53 AM |
| suitable preamp for a tube amp (kt88+12ax7) | kevinkuang | Tubes / Valves | 6 | 17th March 2005 02:22 PM |
| Thinking of building my first tube amp. Suitable projects? | Erik Johansson | Tubes / Valves | 55 | 8th April 2002 11:28 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |