Is there an ideal back loaded horn shape? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Full Range

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th March 2012, 02:45 AM   #1
JZatopa is offline JZatopa  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chicago
Default Is there an ideal back loaded horn shape?

Now that oblate sphéroïde waveguides have brought up the topic of polar response in a two way, I was wondering if there is an idea shape and response to a backloaded horn.

I am also curious if smooth curves in a backloaded horn have better performance, as opposed to speakers where forms are shaped by multiple straight cuts of wood.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2012, 08:13 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Scottmoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
The ideal flare & response is the one which meets the desired design criteria.

Depends what you call 'better.' A continuous flare promotes higher efficiency across the full operating BW of the horn. Whether you actually want that in practice with a back-load is another matter entirely. LF wavelengths are too long to be significantly affected; the effects are more noticable as frequency increases and wavelength decreases. Since, generally speaking, you want to attenuate output from a back-horn above a certain point (250 - 300Hz, give or take), this is not especially beneficial from my POV.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2012, 10:50 AM   #3
Squeak is offline Squeak  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
Squeak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Frederiksberg
Well tractrix is the one with most efficiency for a given length, but has the most honky horn sound of the normally used expansions (the one that comes closest to the old mechanical gramophone horns).
Linear expansion has long been established to be the best from a sound quality PoW. Virtually no colouration within a given frequency window. It just takes longer to reach as deep as the other possible expansions.
Exponential expansion is somewhere in between these two with regards to length vs. effectiveness ratio.

But as Scottmoose said, with backloaded horns the expansion type has little influence on the sound. Even parabolic expansion, which would be bad for a front loaded horn, can work well with the longer frequencies. Just look at all the folded tube horns, and even TQWTs that are sometimes closer to parabolic than linear.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2012, 03:44 PM   #4
JZatopa is offline JZatopa  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chicago
That was exactly what I was looking for, thanks.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Awesome back loaded horn nuconz Full Range 3 6th September 2011 03:17 AM
back loaded horn nige838 Full Range 4 21st October 2010 12:33 PM
Back loaded horn maths scraper Full Range 15 4th April 2010 01:40 PM
Front loaded and back loaded horn DrWoofer.com Subwoofers 0 3rd August 2007 06:55 PM
Back Loaded Horn Calculations Tyimo Multi-Way 3 15th March 2005 03:34 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:47 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2