BK12 versus FH3 for FE126En without a corner... - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Full Range

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 5th March 2012, 07:42 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Chicago
Default BK12 versus FH3 for FE126En without a corner...

I do not have a corner to place these (and it is questionable what may end up behind them, so the rear facing horn of the FH3 (and Austin 126) have me a bit worried.

The wife has nixed the Metronome, Saburo and Chang horns, so I'm pretty much left with the BK12 style of horn... or the little half Changs.

Given a center wall placement, do you think the BK12 holds up better than the FH3 in the same location? Are there other similar folded horns that I should be looking at? Or a cyburg needle style enclosure that works well with the FE126En?

Your guidance is much appreciated.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2012, 09:18 AM   #2
zman01 is offline zman01  Bangladesh
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Dhaka
Do you already have the FE126EN with you, or you have a choice of drivers here?
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2012, 09:38 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Chicago
Already have the FE126En (and the FF85WK, but I'm planning a desktop microOnken for those).
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2012, 11:04 AM   #4
zman01 is offline zman01  Bangladesh
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Dhaka
I am sure others will chime in, but my understanding is that you will need a fairly large cabinet (i.e. Saburo, Kongo or the Changs) to coax bass out a driver like FE126EN. Users of the FH3 can testify to usable LF if placed in corners - which in your case is not available.

So given the circumstances would you consider investing in a new pair of drivers? Various models of Mark Audio and Tang Band drivers should work without corner reinforcement in the FH3.

I have used the CSS EL-70 and Alp 7.3 in FH3 - plenty of LF given cabinet size, and overall sound is good too.

Last edited by zman01; 5th March 2012 at 11:27 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2012, 12:41 PM   #5
jimbro is offline jimbro  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: somewhere in Texas
Half-changs (not at all little) are not for 126s by the way. List is pretty narrow now. Have you tried showing your wife some finished speakers from the gallery? Maybe she'll un-nix one of them.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2012, 01:19 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: USA
Can t do Changs with 126, what about a Frugal with the triangle sets at the back so you don't need a corner. this should help a lot. just a 8x8x8 triangle box or baffle at back.??????? I really like my Frugals with the 126en and when i had them set with a deflector in the back, they worked perfect, similar to corner loading.. JON
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2012, 01:37 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Chicago
No experiences with the BK12? I'm wondering if that with some good attention to the horn shapes (using curved internal paths and flared vent) can help boost its performance - if it needs boosting) and a bsc circuit to balance it a bit.

Jimbro - she was pretty specific in her requirements list, and does not want any speakers taller than her 5' height. And the Austin 126 was nixed for being "just plain ugly."

I supposed I could work the austin's internal shape into a squared cabinet to pretty it up, but I'm still worried about the rear vent in general.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2012, 03:04 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Scottmoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
The madisound BK12m is a reasonable box for what it is & achieves its intended performance goals. Smoothing it will make things worse, you'll just encourage unwanted midrange output through the horn. There is no vent, so nothing to flare.

One of the objects of having a back-horn in the first place is to avoid compensation circuits; it shouldn't require one in most circumstances. However, you may be better off selling the 126s & buying a more versatile unit given that you are obviously very restricted in what you can use.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2012, 03:14 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Chicago
vent = mouth

Interesting, I would never have guessed that a smoother horn path would decrease performance... I always assumed (which I shouldn't do) that the stepped angles in so many of these DIY horns were a compromise for manufacturing ease.

I'm at a point now where I think I need to build a reasonably performing box, as designed, to get a feel for what to expect sound wise, before I start diving into King's work sheets and theory and experimenting.

But maybe you are right about the 126 being too limited a driver. I'll have to ponder. Do you have any recommendations in the same general price range as the 126? (so probably no Alpair or Sigmas).

Last edited by liamstrain; 5th March 2012 at 03:20 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2012, 03:49 PM   #10
zman01 is offline zman01  Bangladesh
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Dhaka
Quote:
Originally Posted by liamstrain View Post

But maybe you are right about the 126 being too limited a driver. I'll have to ponder. Do you have any recommendations in the same general price range as the 126? (so probably no Alpair or Sigmas).
CSS EL70 - slightly cheaper than FE126EN. This driver is made by Mark Fenlon of Mark Audio. If you prefer bright sound then you might consider the CHR-70.3.

Last edited by zman01; 5th March 2012 at 03:53 PM.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
extend current usage of FH3(A7.3) to include HT jjl Full Range 14 24th January 2012 08:31 PM
A subwoofer love-child of FH3 and Shadow? Brisso57 Full Range 3 8th June 2011 08:20 AM
Frugel-horn Shootout FH1+ vs FH3 Alaska Bill Full Range 6 19th April 2011 08:16 PM
FE126En in MLTL slhijb Full Range 15 21st January 2011 10:33 PM
can FH3 beat out the Onken ? Bigun Full Range 7 8th December 2010 05:52 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:29 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2