|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: D-55629 Schwarzerden
|
Two versions of Fane's Full Range Model "Studio 5M" - 100 db and 92,5 db ??
According the datasheets there are two versions of this midrange model, also suited for full range applications without tweeter: 1) The vintage version, that I know und that I have heard several times (100 db version) http://www.hifi-studio.de/hifi-klass.../Studio-5M.pdf http://web.me.com/cad/ArenaSounds/Pr...5M_%26_5FR.pdf Very similar was Monacor's "C5-50M" from Mc Kenzie order code 45.0340 from Monacor's Gerrman catalogue K39. 2) the currently available version "Studio 5M" with only 92,5db sound pressure level but with the same outline (at least according the images by Fane International) go to the new data sheet about http://www.fane-acoustics.com/downlo...o_5M_Specs.pdf Perhaps the 92,5 db by the new data sheet is a misprint. Or is it a completly new design with the old model number? However, the Studio 5MN (neodym magnet version) about http://www.fane-acoustics.com/downlo..._5MN_Specs.pdf is more close to the old "5M" version than to the new "5M" version. Who can post exact informations in this case ? Thank you very much for your efforts. BTW - I need this informations for replace the transducers in an old near field monitor from d&b, model "E1" - images by post #2 about Fane Studio 5M+5FR - in use by which commercial Studio Monitors ?? Last edited by tiefbassuebertr; 10th February 2012 at 10:53 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sulawesi
|
Don't worry, the efficiencies are almost identical for the 3 models : 1.6%, 1.65%, 1.7%.
The different numbers 92.5 dB vs 100 dB are just honest for the first one and marketing department for the second. They claim that the efficiency is the level of the nasty peak at 5000, common practice. Once equalized to be flat, indeed, only 92 dB will remain in the best case. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
|
These measurements might be helpful as well.
http://prodance.cz/protokoly/Studio_5FR.pdf http://prodance.cz/protokoly/fane_studio_5_frk.pdf |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: D-55629 Schwarzerden
|
Quote:
But the speakers are the models "Studio 5FR" and its successor with kevlar diaphragm, the model "Studio 5FRK". I ask to the model "Studio 5M". Which bottom I must use about http://www.prodance.cz/ to find more pdf measurements? Last edited by tiefbassuebertr; 12th February 2012 at 04:53 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hamburg
|
Du musst den Button drücken wo "MĚŘENÍ" steht.
Edith sagt, der Downloadbutton hat auch etwas zu bieten. Btw, an efficiency of 1.7% is 94.3 dB and 1.65% = 94.2 dB. Last edited by georgy; 12th February 2012 at 09:54 PM. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The quest for full HT range..at condo dB levels. | RacinJason1971 | Subwoofers | 27 | 10th July 2011 12:46 AM |
| FS: Full Range Enclosures (19"w x 10.5"h x 12"d) | axissilverhand | Swap Meet | 0 | 19th December 2010 12:01 AM |
| Audax PR170M0 –100 dB or just *94 dB?? | rick57 | Multi-Way | 39 | 14th May 2006 03:58 AM |
| Midrange with 92 or 95 dB | a007udio | Multi-Way | 8 | 26th April 2005 06:12 AM |
| I want pre-amp schematic with A s/n ratio 92 db or more | jinkuchi | Pass Labs | 11 | 6th June 2004 09:21 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.35515 seconds (23.49% PHP - 76.51% MySQL) with 10 queries |