Highish Q FR speaker in BLH enclosure?

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Hi,
For sentimental reasons, and just for fun, I want to use a pair of ancient full range drivers, that someone give me for very little money...
I haven't yet measured these, but I suspect this 8 " inchers to have a 60/70 Hz free air resonance and Qts around 0.8 / 1.0.
Will be possible to mount them in a BLH type enclosure, in order of avoid the use of any baffle step correction circuit ?
I prefer an efficient thing, to be driven by a very low wattage tube amp, so, I'm prepared to sacrifice the low end response (< 50Hz)...
Thanks for any input
 

Attachments

  • s_MLA_v_F_f_127720825_2397.jpg
    s_MLA_v_F_f_127720825_2397.jpg
    172.8 KB · Views: 208
  • s_MLA_v_F_f_127720825_4970.jpg
    s_MLA_v_F_f_127720825_4970.jpg
    106.5 KB · Views: 206
Last edited:
According to an MJK article I read, the higher the driver Qts, the more bass output from a BLH (in terms of volume, not depth). The output will certainly compensate for baffle step, but .8-1 might be a little boomy; the ideal range seemed to be around .6-.7.
 

GM

Member
Joined 2003
According to an MJK article I read, the higher the driver Qts, the more bass output from a BLH (in terms of volume, not depth). The output will certainly compensate for baffle step, but .8-1 might be a little boomy; the ideal range seemed to be around .6-.7.

Absolutely! Reverse engineer one of these essentially open back FLHs and you'll be surprised at how high the driver's effective Qts is to achieve this plus get a 1:1 CR to maximize efficiency with a ~transient perfect response: http://www.audioheritage.org/images/lmco/photos/products/shearer/shearer1.jpg

Right, such systems as this can't be used wide range due to its high gain without horn loading the front of the driver too, so increasing the BLH's filter chamber from the ideal and starting with a smaller than ideal throat to 'shrink' the horn, hence its gain, is required.

Basically, you wind up with what I call a big vent reflex [BVR] since its actual horn [as opposed to TL] loading is limited to a narrow BW above ~ 70-80 Hz.

GM
 
Ok, thanks, once I get the units effectively measured, I'll decide for some kind of BLH or a BVR type.
CLS , I don't have a clue on how this software works, there is a step -by - step worked example somewhere?
Anyway you guys already answered my question: "...in order of avoid the use of any baffle step correction circuit ?" and the answer is "yes" :)
Thanks again
 
Last edited:
Karlson = probably easier than some blh. Wings can be radial arc drawn with a stick-compass and cut with a jigsaw. Two internal baffles: the speaker baffle and the port panel. Use cleats, screws and glue to hold the baffles in proper position. A rear shelf can be added as a lowpass filter in conjunction with a bonded dacron or fiberglass pad. One 4 foot by 8 foot sheet of plywood or particleboard could yield both enclosures.
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.