|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pacific Northwest
|
Not a DIY guy, just curious as an intellectual exercise. Having owned all types of speakers, from full range to planars to 2 way, 3 way etc, in various implementations, ie ported, sealed, aperiodic, horns, etc, it has occurred to me that the following scenario might be a very good way to optimize what is currently available.
If one were to take one of the better 3" drivers currently offered, what would the size need to be, depth, length and diameter at edge, to obtain linear response down to 200hz, utilizing an oblate spheroid flare?
__________________
"If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research, would it?" A. Einstein |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Calgary on the Bow
|
Take a look here for some good ideas, you will need to be concerned about the driver peramateres if you want to run it in a horn. Hope this is of interest. Best regards Moray James.
inlowsound.com
__________________
moray james |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pacific Northwest
|
Thanks for that. It looks to be more of an exponential geometry for that paper horn. I would imagine a 3" or 4" Alpair driver would shorten the horn and using an oblate spheroid flare would shorten the horn further still. Maintaining the the 30" mouth would still be required to reach the 300 hz low end probably. Trying to go lower would require a larger diameter.
__________________
"If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research, would it?" A. Einstein |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Calgary on the Bow
|
The construction method given can be used for any shape mold you like. John has done some fine work. Have you given any thought to the Unity or Synergy approach. It is a less complex build and has much to admire? There are a number of ongoing builds at the moment so a lot of ground work has already been done. Higher efficiency and lower distortion in a very domestic size. Best regards Moray James.
__________________
moray james |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Best 8" to 12" driver for 130hz tractrix horn | 3GGG | Multi-Way | 270 | 8th November 2011 02:39 PM |
| Compression driver horn as "full range"? | Racket Scientist | Full Range | 16 | 18th December 2010 08:44 PM |
| 12" driver enclosure size | xeclipse | Subwoofers | 10 | 22nd September 2010 02:53 PM |
| bass double horn for 3"-8" driver | hm | Subwoofers | 6 | 2nd July 2010 09:49 AM |
| horn for two 3" driver | hm | Full Range | 13 | 22nd March 2007 12:01 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07589 seconds (70.83% PHP - 29.17% MySQL) with 10 queries |