Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Full Range
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 26th July 2011, 04:02 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Harderror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Washington DC
Default New BLH for 8" drivers "The Blizzard"

You know, I was going through my designs and with the 8" full range driver being so common these days I thought I would mention a design I did last winter that should work equally well for the AN, Lowther, Tang Band, Dayton etc. etc. Low Qts drivers. The reason I never finished it and put it up for whoever wants it is my roof broke under the weight of the snow we had here in the District of Columbia. I was so busy dealing with that that I forgot about this design. Not only that but the last year has been a busy one with my house and with the 2 way 3 way and line array projects I have been working on. That said here's the pitch:

The Blizzard
More compact than any long path 8" BLH that I have designed as of yet. It should have an F3 of around 40 Hz and an F6 of around 36Hz. The design overall looks pretty promising. Have a look at the projected in room simulation. Dimension are around 11x25x56 inches. The build should be easy as there are zero mitered joints in this one (I know amazing coming from me!)

I haven't done a cut sheet, or a plan packet yet but that can be arranged if there is any interest. FWIW I figured I would ask after this since I always love to get plans for my ideas out there.

Plot1 shows the projected in room response simulation and plot2 shows the simmed combined system response. Overall pretty nice looking.

Tom
Attached Images
File Type: jpg BLIZZARD final with curves.jpg (90.4 KB, 729 views)
File Type: jpg plot1.jpg (49.7 KB, 680 views)
File Type: jpg plot2.jpg (46.1 KB, 654 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2011, 05:55 PM   #2
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
Hi Tom,

What driver is the sim with?

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2011, 06:16 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Harderror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Washington DC
Sorry Dave, the driver in the sim is the Tang Band W8-1772. I am about to sim it with the new Dayton and see what that turns back.

Tom
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2011, 06:38 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Harderror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Washington DC
Okay, here are the projected system graph and the projected in room system graph respectively for the Dayton PS220-8. Looks promising! Almost looks like the extension will be a little lower than the Tang Band but I don't know how either sounds as I haven't been able to audition either.

Tom
Attached Images
File Type: jpg dayton projected.jpg (45.2 KB, 615 views)
File Type: jpg dayton in room projected.jpg (49.7 KB, 593 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2011, 08:43 PM   #5
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harderror View Post
Tang Band W8-1772
That driver, when introduced, was a bit costy given the performance, with a near doubling of price, its cost/performance is now way out of touch.

The Dayton has only gone up $10 each, so is still in the running.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2011, 09:47 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Harderror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Washington DC
Yeah, I remember that being an expensive unit. I had no idea that they were at 321 a piece now. There is no way I would support Tang Band at this point. All of their prices have gone through the roof. Good news is I designed the horn to work with pretty much any of the 8" low Q drivers out there. I am very interested in this Dayton of course. The list of drivers that I feel are competitive that can be dropped in to this horn are of course the ANS8, Cast ANS8, Dayton PS220-8, Decware DFR-8, and on another level the Sonodyne' Lowther, etc. As long as it's 8 inches with a qts of say between .15-.3 they should be a good match. Does this sound like a reasonable range Dave?

As an afterthought, I forgot to mention all the low Qts Fostex drivers. Sorry guys, I just don't do their stuff anymore. I lost the "taste" for their sound. All apologies!

Tom

Last edited by Harderror; 26th July 2011 at 09:50 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2011, 10:15 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Harderror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Washington DC
Sorry to keep posting guys but I realized that I had posted a sim based on the published T/S parameters for the Dayton and not the measured. Following are the measured sims. First is the combined sim of projected FR and the second is the combined sim of in room projected FR. Once again, sorry guys.

Tom

I hate switching system as well. I am a Mac user that keeps PCs around for just this sort of stuff. Why won't the Mathcad folks support Mac? Ah well...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg dayton projected.jpg (45.9 KB, 88 views)
File Type: jpg dayton in room projected.jpg (49.9 KB, 72 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2011, 04:34 AM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
blakkshepeaudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Country Victoria Australia
Very interested in this design: very much looking forward to further info.

Rgds,
blakkshepeaudio
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2011, 06:51 AM   #9
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harderror View Post
... Decware DFR-8...I forgot to mention all the low Qts Fostex drivers. Sorry guys, I just don't do their stuff anymore. I lost the "taste" for their sound.
The Decware retains most of the character of the FE206 it is based on.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2011, 12:14 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
That looks like a really cool design, and one that could be built without a lot of tools. I’ve always wanted to try the Fostex FW208N in a blh. The specs look great to me.

fs 29 Hz

Qms 13.2

Qes 0.21

Qts 0.20

Mms 40 g

Cms - mm/N

Sd - cm2

BL - N/A

Vas 43.4 ltrs

Xmax 6.5 mm peak



Is there any way you could sim it? Thank you.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What makes an amplifier "bright", "warm", or "neutral"? JohnS Solid State 51 13th December 2009 06:42 PM
70cm tall, 3 way, diy speakers based on 10"/4"/1" japanese ken brown drivers. facundonu Multi-Way 34 9th March 2009 04:59 AM
Randy Slone's "Fig 11.4" (Self's "Blameless"?): PCB layout tcpip Solid State 126 15th February 2007 04:50 PM
what does "BLH" and adjustable CC mean? roystr Full Range 2 5th June 2006 01:00 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:15 PM.

Page generated in 0.10230 seconds (85.57% PHP - 14.43% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio