|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
Ladies(if there is any
& Gentlemen:I've got a pair of HIVI M4N and wanna build a pair of sealed box, but when i input the parameters into winISD then I've got a 121l of box volume, it seemed something wrong, I input the params into a web calculator, I got negative box volume, is there anybody can tell me why? BTW: I think those results were caused by the Qts which as 1.08, is it wright? what can I do for calculate the correct box volume? Any feedback will be great appreciated, thanks for reading. FYI: HIVI M4N: http://www.hiviresearch.com/driver/h...st.php?type=11 Web cauculator which gave me negative box volume(not the calculator's fault): Speaker Box Calculations |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
You will get a negative box volume if driver Qts is higher that the box Q target. with a Vas of ~ 4.5L your looking at a sealed box around 6L or some pretty wacky vented alignments up to 9L. Typical calculators go for Qbox of 0.7, your looking at =1.4 6L, =1.3 9L. TBH there not a lot of real difference between the two, both bass peak. 6L sealed gives you a 3 dB hump around 100Hz. 9L vented at 50Hz gives loads more bass and will probably works best as a power handling alignment combined with the 80Hz setting of an AV amplifier (small). Without AV a bass bump can compensate for no bass lower down. rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow |
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
HI Sreten:
Quote:
And here can i do anything to reduce the Qtc down to 0.7 for the enclosure? Wht the manufacturer design those drivers on such a high Qts? What's the advantage of such a high Q drivers? Quote:
Unfortunately i don't have any AV amp, i drive my bookshelves on a DIY LM1875 amp. Thank you very much for your reply
|
||
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
The easiest way of making a high Q driver is taking a decent driver and fitting it with an undersized magnet, its cheap and cheerful. I suspect the driver is developed for HT systems. Used as a mid only the bass peak would be less troublesome. The B4N seems a decent driver, but needs a clever crossover : https://sites.google.com/site/undefi...ightsensations One approach would be undersize your amplifiers input capacitor, set it for 100Hz, i.e. -3dB at 100Hz. This would combine with the driver to be flat to 100Hz, and then a 3rd order roll-off below that, but you ideally need a sub for real bass. rgds, sreten,
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow Last edited by sreten; 7th July 2011 at 12:13 PM. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
Hi Sreten:
please tell me undersize to what criteria? undersize to the suggested 5l box? or what? and the like you quoted was unreachable here, was it hivi b4n? thanks. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
At Parte Express the B4N is the same price as the M4N and seems in all respects a better choice than the M4N, especially regarding published designs for it. Compare the weights of the 2 drivers, the M4N must have smaller fitted magnets. The tricky c/o used on the B4N implies something similar is needed for the M4N. M4N : http://www.parts-express.com/pdf/297-434.pdf TBH if building something I'd bite the bullet and go for the B4N, lower Fs, lower Qts, higher sensitivity (+ 3dB) all add up to a much better driver. Both drivers need clever work in the crossover to work properly. rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
Sreten:
Thank you very much for your advise, I'll try accordingly. have a nice weekend. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
Sreten:
Thank you very much for your advise, I'll try accordingly. have a nice weekend. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
I have to repost : https://sites.google.com/site/undefi...ightsensations Lots of information ; Lots of options ; Great $24 cabinet options ; You can't go wrong. Even on PE there are loads more actually useful files on the B4N for rolling your own. The c/o is so tricky for both IMO you might as well give up on the M4N, go for the B4N. In terms of time, effort, confusion and being happy I highly recommend this action. rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow Last edited by sreten; 9th July 2011 at 02:08 AM. |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Completed GR-Research Paradox-3's | Hewie | Multi-Way | 21 | 3rd February 2013 08:26 PM |
| what sounds best . . . Low Qts in small cab or higher Qts in bigger cab | mikelm | Subwoofers | 18 | 15th July 2009 10:46 AM |
| What if instead of a speaker with a Qts=1 I use a different Qts?? | Tuliman | Multi-Way | 2 | 14th December 2004 11:54 AM |
| FS: GR Research Paradox 1 in natural oak finish | Saurav | Swap Meet | 0 | 25th February 2003 07:43 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |