Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Full Range
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 6th July 2011, 03:30 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Default Paradox in HIVI M4N's Qts.

Ladies(if there is any & Gentlemen:

I've got a pair of HIVI M4N and wanna build a pair of sealed box, but when i input the parameters into winISD then I've got a 121l of box volume, it seemed something wrong, I input the params into a web calculator, I got negative box volume, is there anybody can tell me why?

BTW: I think those results were caused by the Qts which as 1.08, is it wright? what can I do for calculate the correct box volume?

Any feedback will be great appreciated, thanks for reading.

FYI:
HIVI M4N: http://www.hiviresearch.com/driver/h...st.php?type=11
Web cauculator which gave me negative box volume(not the calculator's fault): Speaker Box Calculations
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th July 2011, 04:14 PM   #2
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Hi,

You will get a negative box volume if driver Qts is higher that the box Q target.
with a Vas of ~ 4.5L your looking at a sealed box around 6L or some pretty
wacky vented alignments up to 9L.
Typical calculators go for Qbox of 0.7, your looking at =1.4 6L, =1.3 9L.
TBH there not a lot of real difference between the two, both bass peak.

6L sealed gives you a 3 dB hump around 100Hz. 9L vented at 50Hz gives
loads more bass and will probably works best as a power handling alignment
combined with the 80Hz setting of an AV amplifier (small).

Without AV a bass bump can compensate for no bass lower down.

rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann
When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2011, 11:21 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
HI Sreten:

Quote:
Originally Posted by sreten View Post
Hi,

You will get a negative box volume if driver Qts is higher that the box Q target.
with a Vas of ~ 4.5L your looking at a sealed box around 6L or some pretty
wacky vented alignments up to 9L.
Typical calculators go for Qbox of 0.7, your looking at =1.4 6L, =1.3 9L.
TBH there not a lot of real difference between the two, both bass peak.
for here understood, so can i ask you what sounds different for a speaker system at a 0.7 and 1.x in Qtc?

And here can i do anything to reduce the Qtc down to 0.7 for the enclosure?
Wht the manufacturer design those drivers on such a high Qts? What's the advantage of such a high Q drivers?


Quote:
Originally Posted by sreten View Post
6L sealed gives you a 3 dB hump around 100Hz. 9L vented at 50Hz gives
loads more bass and will probably works best as a power handling alignment
combined with the 80Hz setting of an AV amplifier (small).

Without AV a bass bump can compensate for no bass lower down.

rgds, sreten.

Unfortunately i don't have any AV amp, i drive my bookshelves on a DIY LM1875 amp.

Thank you very much for your reply
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2011, 12:09 PM   #4
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Hi,

The easiest way of making a high Q driver is taking a decent driver
and fitting it with an undersized magnet, its cheap and cheerful.

I suspect the driver is developed for HT systems.
Used as a mid only the bass peak would be less troublesome.

The B4N seems a decent driver, but needs a clever crossover :
https://sites.google.com/site/undefi...ightsensations

One approach would be undersize your amplifiers input capacitor,
set it for 100Hz, i.e. -3dB at 100Hz. This would combine with
the driver to be flat to 100Hz, and then a 3rd order roll-off
below that, but you ideally need a sub for real bass.

rgds, sreten,
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann
When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow

Last edited by sreten; 7th July 2011 at 12:13 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2011, 12:37 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Hi Sreten:

please tell me undersize to what criteria? undersize to the suggested 5l box? or what?

and the like you quoted was unreachable here, was it hivi b4n?

thanks.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2011, 12:55 PM   #6
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Hi,

At Parte Express the B4N is the same price as the M4N and seems in all respects
a better choice than the M4N, especially regarding published designs for it.

Compare the weights of the 2 drivers, the M4N must have smaller fitted magnets.

The tricky c/o used on the B4N implies something similar is needed for the M4N.

M4N : http://www.parts-express.com/pdf/297-434.pdf

TBH if building something I'd bite the bullet and go for the B4N, lower Fs,
lower Qts, higher sensitivity (+ 3dB) all add up to a much better driver.

Both drivers need clever work in the crossover to work properly.

rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann
When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2011, 03:02 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Sreten:

Thank you very much for your advise, I'll try accordingly.
have a nice weekend.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2011, 03:04 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Sreten:

Thank you very much for your advise, I'll try accordingly.
have a nice weekend.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th July 2011, 01:44 AM   #9
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Hi,

I have to repost : https://sites.google.com/site/undefi...ightsensations

Lots of information ; Lots of options ; Great $24 cabinet options ; You can't go wrong.

Even on PE there are loads more actually useful files on the B4N for rolling your own.

The c/o is so tricky for both IMO you might as well give up on the M4N, go for the B4N.

In terms of time, effort, confusion and being happy I highly recommend this action.

rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann
When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow

Last edited by sreten; 9th July 2011 at 02:08 AM.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Completed GR-Research Paradox-3's Hewie Multi-Way 21 3rd February 2013 08:26 PM
what sounds best . . . Low Qts in small cab or higher Qts in bigger cab mikelm Subwoofers 18 15th July 2009 10:46 AM
What if instead of a speaker with a Qts=1 I use a different Qts?? Tuliman Multi-Way 2 14th December 2004 11:54 AM
FS: GR Research Paradox 1 in natural oak finish Saurav Swap Meet 0 25th February 2003 07:43 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:08 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 30.00%)
Copyright ©1999-2013 diyAudio