|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Excellent. I should see my FF85 & FF125 wed or so then.
I see they have inhereted the dust cap from FE138eSR. dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
|
No sign of the 125 yet on the listings, all the others are there though.
Re the dustcap, seems to be aluminium. I think that (in magnesium form) was in fact first seen in the Fostex range on the Japan-only limited edition WG850. Colour me a bit disappointed though. Granted these are not supposed to be top end models, but I'd still hoped for a little more; they look reasonable units for what they are, but they don't appear to have moved things on at all in engineering terms. Perhaps that's a consequence of trying to use them to replace two ranges (FFxx5K & FExx7E), or perhaps they're struggling a bit following the apparant departure of some of their design / development people. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
It appears to have a high hysteresis surround, so a damping ring like required on a rubber one may be a good tweak.
GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
the 225 seems interesting when adding a supertweeter.
However it has a scary bump at 3khz - I expect an irritating bite in the sound there if no corrective action is taken. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Newark, DE
|
I'm really curious to hear how these work out, especially in horn loaded boxes. I can't help but wonder if they are a suitable replacement for the old FF85K. It seems the total Q is a little higher and the BL is a little lower, which isn't what I think I'd want for a horn loaded driver.
Moving mass is spec'd a bit higher and excursion is less, which doesn't seem good either. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
the frequency plot of the new FF85K seemed the best one to me. I expect it to be interesting in a small box, actively filtered & biamped with a subwoofer.
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
FF225WK appears to have more Xmax than the previous ?
and ofcourse much lower sensitivity |
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Quote:
GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
|
Wonder when/if they will present a new all-out assault on the 8" full-range concept? The interest in these drivers is probably bigger than ever, and at least here in Europe the market is ripe and ready.
Imagine an improved version of the FE208ES-R.... |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Two different fullrangers in the same cab without x-over | Squeak | Full Range | 30 | 4th September 2011 08:11 AM |
| Madisound Fostex BK-16 cabinents | whitelabrat | Swap Meet | 1 | 1st September 2010 04:16 PM |
| So what does everyone feed their fullrangers with? | Rick J. B. | Full Range | 159 | 27th December 2009 06:36 AM |
| Tesla Fullrangers.... | JandG | Full Range | 9 | 31st July 2008 05:23 AM |
| Madisound Fostex kit.... | jeremyg | Full Range | 5 | 8th January 2005 08:58 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |