|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
|
I wanted to hear peoples opinions out there about which is better in a back-loaded folded horn: smooth curved bends vs angles corners.
For discussion sake, lets ignore how much more difficult smooth curves can be in the build process. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Smooth curves will increase the effective bandwidth of the horn. In a rear-loaded horn this usually causes too much mid-frequency out of the horn mouth, increasing comb filtering and blurring the midrange.
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: victoria BC
|
Quote:
"better" in what respect? I'd opine it depends on the overall design brief - i.e. whether you'd like to use numerous hard cornered folds as part of the HP filtering scheme, or want as much mid-range acoustic output from the mouth(s) as possible - at the expense of artifacts that Dave noted above.
__________________
you don't really believe everything you think, do you? community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com commercial site planet10-HiFi |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
|
Edit -Dave & Chris beat me to it.
Like most things in audio, there's no such thing as 'better' per se, it's entirely dependant upon the design goals. Smooth curves will provide higher efficiency across a wider BW. Conversely, sharp angles can be used (I use them in this way for e.g.) to assist as a low-pass function. Last edited by Scottmoose; 17th March 2011 at 06:01 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
I take it you are asking about folded bass horns
apart from the good 'points' in the other posts maybe you think of smooth round curves versus 'just' placing a 45 degr plate in all corners I doubt it makes much difference at low frequncy, maybe even a 45degr bend have no or little advantage over 90 degr corners your worst worries is the 'inner' side of a corner with a bend going round a sharp corner, usually a baffle to make a smooth rounding effective, the inner side should have a smooth rounded transistion a well first and most you should look at volume transistion but if bending around a sharp corner, it gets a bit unpredictive and thus difficult to know exactly if it works the way its planned to |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: near Hamburg Germany
|
Hello i use softfiber for the presschamber and the
first meter of the horn, i take 45° plate in the corner, specially at the beginn of a horn the left 45° plate can be a large room in comparison to the horn size a that point, this would cause inner reflections with material sound of the horn together the sound will get colourated. softfibre + Hornmouth measurements Kornett
__________________
http://www.hm-moreart.de |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
|
Thankyou all for the great replies. In fact I'm planning on a BLH for a pair of Coral Beta 8a (the 16w ones). I know about the traditional Coral horn the was designed for the Beta 8 but I was thinking of experimenting a bit with the design.
I understand every design choice in audio is a trade off of one kind for another. I promise I'll try never to say better again. I do remember reading the concept of using sharp angle for low pass... I just can't remember where. Wish I could. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
Gents, what about .... Ronhorn / Dallas, Austin or C horn
How can i untherstand the high raputation of these horns Bart |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
|
What about them?
Ron's preference is for maximum energy preservation, so he avoids very sharp angles. I don't know if the C horns have a high reputation so your guess is as good as mine on that score. As has been stated, there is no real answer to the original question. What is used is entirely dependant upon the design goals. Last edited by Scottmoose; 18th March 2011 at 03:02 PM. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| No Room Corners | Tamaki | Full Range | 14 | 25th September 2010 10:29 PM |
| Derive Triode Curves from Pentode Curves? | dsavitsk | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 14th May 2007 06:10 PM |
| 1850 folded horns | tsc | Subwoofers | 5 | 5th May 2006 12:27 PM |
| Are angled braces necessary? | PWatts | Multi-Way | 5 | 17th July 2003 10:58 AM |
| folded horns | bonsai171 | Multi-Way | 12 | 23rd December 2002 09:45 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11042 seconds (81.27% PHP - 18.73% MySQL) with 11 queries |