Critique my F200a design - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Full Range

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 14th March 2011, 04:25 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Default Critique my F200a design

So.....been playing around in winisd. Before any slamming comes my way.....the goal here was to get good response in a large standmount monitor. I do understand that more extension can be had with this driver in a much larger cabinet......but just not possible considering space and overall room design criteria. Ended up with a 1.5ft3 quasi golden ratio ported cab tuned to 37hz....inside dimensions 14.25w X 8.25D X 22T. Provided the sim translates to the actual end result I think I've got something here......F3 of 42hz and F10 of 30hz respectively. Thoughts?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg f200a vented golden ratio 37hz.JPG (157.9 KB, 167 views)
__________________
It is only rarely that one can see in a little boy the promise of a man, but one can almost always see in a little girl the threat of a woman. ~Alexandre Dumas
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th March 2011, 10:44 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
I'm guessing the lack of feedback is due mostly to little subjective experience with this pricey driver. My only pertinent question I've yet to decide on is port diameter..........will going with a shorter 2" port introduce port noise? My logic says no, as the driver is not moving enough air to be of concern at only 2mm xmax.
__________________
It is only rarely that one can see in a little boy the promise of a man, but one can almost always see in a little girl the threat of a woman. ~Alexandre Dumas
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th March 2011, 11:05 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
vinylkid58's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Victoria, B.C.
Quote:
Originally Posted by steviedon View Post
Provided the sim translates to the actual end result I think I've got something here......F3 of 42hz and F10 of 30hz respectively. Thoughts?
Given my experience using WinIsd, there's no reason why you shouldn't get decent bass response, unless the provided TS numbers are completely OTL.

Both boxes I've done turned out ok.

jeff
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Critique my first design bigwill Tubes / Valves 11 3rd June 2007 11:30 AM
critique my amp design please AudioGeek Solid State 6 26th February 2007 04:50 PM
Design critique MWP Digital Source 6 22nd August 2004 04:20 AM
Design critique MWP Chip Amps 6 20th August 2004 03:54 AM
Please critique this design.... Christof Multi-Way 22 10th January 2004 07:17 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:34 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2