|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Stockholm
|
I built the Trike pipes as published in HFN&RR, then I found the Decca Corner Horns DCH(really pipes with the driver facing into the corner angled slightly uppwards).
The history of the DHC dates back to 1949, the HFN&RR publication is much later in the early 60s. It it built in 9mm plywood (3/8" in Imperial units) and the only improvement is to remove a brace! As is is said to sound better that way. There is no damping material what so ever in the enclosure I have some Philps 9710 that are very shouty when facing forward, so upward or backward might work better. Having a thin-walled enclosure devoid of damping material and having flexing wall as absorbers of resonans make me feel a bit uneasy. My initial plan is to build two boxes, one by the book in 10mm OSB and one conventionally built with thicker material more braces and damping material in the first part of the pipe. But if anyone already have tried I would like to know before I start. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Have you got pictures? The original article?
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: near Hamburg Germany
|
Hello DrBoar,
the 9710 with my satellite horns Schalmei , Trumpet, or Horn and you will get ~100 dB from ~130 Hz, so you need a strong sub, take a look at my HP.
__________________
http://www.hm-moreart.de |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Stockholm
|
There is drawing athttp://img89.imageshack.us/img89/295/247wk.jpg
To get a feel for it size and looks AudioJumble - Previous Events I can scan the original article and put it online tonight |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
It is quite small....
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
|
I've read the original article and from recollection, the thin wall cabinet was deliberate. I'm not quite sure what it meant to achieve. I think the HFN article was by Ralph West, so a Google might find it. There was also a more modern version (forward-facing) published by Electronics Today in the UK in the 1980s.
I've heard Lowthers in a similar enclosure, designed to face into corners. The sound was quite pleasant if diffuse. Bear in mind that the reason for this arrangement dates back to mono, when the designers wanted to achieve a nice spread of sound from one speaker enclosure. PS David Weems has more about them here http://tqwp.narod.ru/Theory/Weems/Weems-en1.htm Last edited by Colin; 11th February 2011 at 10:28 AM. Reason: p.s. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Stockholm
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Stockholm
|
The pictures are all screwed up. All my images hosted at photobucket are suddenly thumbnails. So my total account is now down to 430kb...
I will look into other hosts |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
FWIW my first speaker was a Decca corner "horn" used against a wall, along with a tripletone mono ampliifier, and a ceramic equipped BSR turntable. As I recall the back section was made of ~ 3/8" plywood, but the veneered sections, the front, top and sides where made of ~ 3/16" plywood, no damping. Cannot recall the internal partition, but I would say ~ 1/4" is the most likely. All joints as I recall used ~ 1/2"x1/2" battening, except the back top faceting. The 8" unit eventually expired, and putting in an 8" fane dual cone did not work at all, it turned into a boom box, damping did not help at all. I'd say it needs a fairly low Q but fairly high Fs 8" driver. rgds, sreten. Only an American would think a pair of them are not imposing ......
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow Last edited by sreten; 17th February 2011 at 11:59 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Stockholm
|
pictures removed by moderation
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Corner Horn | tinitus | Multi-Way | 30 | 13th December 2006 11:10 PM |
| Why could corner horn not be this simple? | mashaffer | Subwoofers | 1 | 12th March 2006 01:37 AM |
| TQWP/horn - is it any good? | Nuuk | Multi-Way | 6 | 23rd July 2005 06:28 PM |
| TQWP, Onken, BL Horn | AlexanderS | Multi-Way | 0 | 23rd March 2005 09:15 AM |
| 1/4wave corner horn scan? | mikee12345 | Multi-Way | 14 | 11th April 2003 12:46 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11363 seconds (81.14% PHP - 18.86% MySQL) with 11 queries |