|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Lake Superior
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
|
Quote:
The important thing is, that the combined opening at the exit area of the iBIB should at least be equal to final piece of the horn, just like with a normal ceiling firing BIB. You don't want to narrow the horn after expansion. If you are doing corner or floor/wall loading (which you should to get the best effect of the iBIB), you should also consider doing a slanted plate at the bottom to help reflect the sound out at the wall and also to avoid standing waves that bounces off the floor back up the horn. Last edited by Squeak; 31st January 2011 at 04:12 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
FWIW, I've periodically posted that all of the few pipe horns I built were floor reflex loaded with Av = Sd with me and their owners being pleased with the results, though this was before there was any really low signal LFE available to consumers. Regardless, some Hornresp sims indicate that doing it and/or capping 'normal' top exit BIBs with a reverse cone will theoretically be a worthwhile tweak in at least some instances, though AFAIK, no one has tried it yet and reported back.
GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Yes, and no, ML-TQWTs (ML-horns) are tuned like 1/4 WL vented or TL alignments, not 1/2 WL as BIB (pipe) horns.
GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
This far below Fs, I'm betting for the better.........
GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
|
Well you get higher efficiency in a smaller box, and the small BR hump before the LF extension falls off a cliff, that gives the illusion of lower extension.
The trade-off is lack of precision and lack of extended smooth roll-off. |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
|
Ok, maybe I'll cut a "rounded" triangle instead of an exact Karlson. But I do not have undestood how to estimate its area. And, maybe most important, are there REAL advantages to build Ibib instead of Bib?
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
|
Quote:
The advantage of the iBIB is that you can make it smaller and maybe also get better ear level driver placement which is very important with FR drivers as they beam like crazy. With a normal BIB you want to get pretty close to the ceiling to get good loading. So you need a tall speaker if you have high ceilings. A small driver like the FE126 doesn't really warrant a large box anyway. Last edited by Squeak; 31st January 2011 at 06:21 PM. |
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| my new BIB (again...) | nirvana | Full Range | 31 | 24th December 2008 05:13 PM |
| AJ-Horn & BiB - ar some BiB "parabolic"? | freddi | Full Range | 3 | 6th April 2007 03:09 PM |
| Bib...? | Fuling | Full Range | 3 | 11th March 2007 07:45 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |