|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
|
Just spotted it- good looking little driver- big rise above 10 khz
W3-1285SG - TB speakers 3 inch titanium cone fullrange - Europe Audio |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sofia-Bulgaria
|
Quote:
What my eye sees is that from 10 kHz to 20 kHz the rise is about exactly 12 db. And from 10 to 20 kHz it is exactly one octave... So you could try a second order low pass filter - 12 db/oct But someone with more experience should tell whether you should calculate the values of C and L using 15 khz (-6 db) as a crossover point - If I state that I might mislead you. Otherwise the SPL looks pretty good between 300 hz and 8-9-10 khz it seems to be +/- 1.5 db - if I see is correctly it's minimum is 85 db and it's maximum is 88 db for that range - pretty impressive. Now as I look more carefully the 12 db gain is between about 8 khz and 16 kHz - again one octave. -6 db point should be at about 13500 hz, someone else should tell us what crossover point that corresponds to and what Q crossover/slope should be used - Linkwitz, Butterworth or Tchebishev... That's from me and thanks in advance to the one who explains the needed crossover point. Last edited by T101; 11th December 2010 at 02:49 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berkel en Rodenrijs
|
Quote:
and with regards to the rising high end: just listen a bit off axis and all will be fine
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
|
Henkjan does it need Notch Filter?
__________________
some of my Designs www.dynablaster.deviantart.com/gallery |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
|
Good to know they perform well, they look like they should. How far off axis? anyway, a little rise is a good thing for large rooms imo.. if I use, I don`t want anything in signal path other than 1st order.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berkel en Rodenrijs
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
|
just 10 degrees toe in? great! My first choice was the alpair 6 but the surround is far too wide for my build. How do you think the sound compares?
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berkel en Rodenrijs
|
[disclaimer: this goes from memory of a couple years ago]: the Alpair6 is more neutral than the W3-1285, the TB has more crisp. what you like more in the long run I can't tell, I did not have the speakers with the little TBs long.
one important thing: the TB really needs a woofer, it has virtually no capability for bass. it really is more a midtweeter than full range. The Alpair6 (given the right cabinet) can give you full range (at moderate volumes of course, it still is a small driver) btw: if you can get hold of a pair of the square basket Alpair6s, you should be able to squeeze them in a slim space |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
|
cheers, thats v interesting. I want a crisp sound. I will use a 1st order so little to no bass duties for the full range drivers, 2 each side and stereo 'subs' underneath
The enclosures are 'bullet' shaped, hence the need for a small diameter unit.. it would mean hack sawing the edges off the alpair 6 to fit.. not something i want to try. On the images of the Tang band, there is a shiny glue(?) 'ring' on the rubber surround- does it make it a bit cheap looking? Last edited by Bill poster; 4th January 2011 at 04:24 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
|
for me this shiny ring makes it cyber high-tec looking
__________________
some of my Designs www.dynablaster.deviantart.com/gallery |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sub for Tangband W3-871S ? | Kees | Subwoofers | 1 | 23rd March 2008 08:20 PM |
| is the Tangband W3-871 the same as W3-871S | michelevit | Full Range | 11 | 6th December 2006 07:09 AM |
| Tangband W3-871S | wim | Full Range | 5 | 8th November 2005 03:50 PM |
| help... please....Tangband W3-871 | yepper | Full Range | 4 | 17th December 2004 04:06 AM |
| TangBand W3-871S | Jye | Multi-Way | 47 | 27th July 2004 06:07 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10770 seconds (81.27% PHP - 18.73% MySQL) with 10 queries |