use the less efficient driver on the back of each?
sealed for 126? - presumably some type of bass reinforcement?
There's plans for a small sub in the future. Just gotta take it one thing at a time. Right now I want to concentrate on fullrange side. Anybody object on the dipole idea? I thought about the efficiency of the 126EN but that was the only thing I could think of. All the other specs didn't seem like it would make it too wacky. I was going to go OB but I don't want to use a BSC. I also thought about facing the 126EN forward and having the 126E facing up. I've seen some enclosures go that route and people have praised them. Thanks for the feedback guys.
any version of the FE126 really wants some type of horn for maximum unassisted performance, or be run as mid & up with some type of bass driver(s) ( such as numerous OB projects - e.g. the MJK model)
nothing wrong with bipole for the right application, (I'm famously a fan of a certain dual driver design, with one top firing), but if small and/ or sealed is your intention, there are many far better drivers for that (such as the discontinued
FE127E), regardless of the physical configuration in the boxhowever, since you have the FE126, there are compact horn designs that would likely work as well as a bipole and possibly require less room in which to 'breathe' (particularly the front mouth types or inverted BIB)
BTW, to predict correction by the lexicon police - I think you mean bipole - not dipole - they're not the same thing
of course if there's room available they'd be a great solution (sometimes it's hard to keep track of who's got what room issues..
)- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.