|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: San Francisco
|
Hey All,
I have a question that's been nagging at me for awhile and can't seem to find the answer to it. Apologies if this has been answered in the past. I'm designing some new back-loaded horn cabinets for the FE208EΣ driver and I noticed some back-loaded horn builders use a smooth contour for the horn section, while others use the fostex recommended stair-case hard edge contour. My question is, why use one over the other? I'm assuming it matters Also, if someone knows a good book they could recommend on the subject, I'd appreciate it. Thanks in advance! |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle,Wash.
|
Quote:
The stair steps in the original Japanese designs, were actually a series of vertical bulkheads that were used to contain rounded river rocks. Best Regards, TerryO
__________________
"If you have to ask why, then you're probably on the right track." quote from Terry Olson's DIYaudio Forum application |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
Apparently, the rationale is that the stair-step has a low-pass effect, keeping higher frequencies from comb-filtering with the directly radiated output.
I don't know of a book but there are patents, papers etc. Most important thing seems to be a good simulation tool and thousands of hours Okay, now do tell about this horn you're designing! |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: San Francisco
|
Thanks guys,
That makes a lot of sense on keeping the highs out from where they don't belong - thanks! Right now everything is in sketchbook stage, but I will post when I have things nailed down more (design-wise) and my volume calculations accurate. Thanks again, Thor |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eindhoven
|
We made the first part ( near the throath) more smooth, and left the lower part with stairgase.
Idea behind it : where the pressure is high , make smooth , where the pressure is lower , reject the mid - parts of the audio spectrum. Search for the "ibR 108 horn" in this section of this forum, there are pics showing the idea. Good luck!!
__________________
Leon |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| back loaded horn | nige838 | Full Range | 4 | 21st October 2010 12:33 PM |
| Horn loaded JXR6 which contour HOM suppression | jzagaja | Full Range | 12 | 19th October 2010 11:46 AM |
| Back loaded horn maths | scraper | Full Range | 15 | 4th April 2010 01:40 PM |
| Front loaded and back loaded horn | DrWoofer.com | Subwoofers | 0 | 3rd August 2007 06:55 PM |
| Would like details of this Back Loaded Horn | mrlots2do | Multi-Way | 7 | 16th January 2005 02:54 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09283 seconds (72.07% PHP - 27.93% MySQL) with 10 queries |