|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
|
Hi everybody. Tony Gee sent me the plans for Solo-166 encolsures, for Fostex FE166En drivers. They are similar to SOlo-103 that you can see here:
Humble Homemade Hifi Did anybody tried them for 166? Thanks all Ziocalepino |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Unlike FE103, FE166 is not well suited to a BR.
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
|
Thanks. Althought there is not a "Solo-126" project do you think these drivers are more suitable for this kind of plan? I'va a couple of them but used monunted both in Fostex pure BR and in the Fostex' original mixed enclosure BR/BLH they do not satisfy me. So with a different configuration...
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
All of the FExx6 series drivers really need to be horn loaded to get any bass out of them.
FE127 works well in a Solo 127. It is called a Fonken. Be easy enuff to mutate the design to get something that looks like a Solo103 (but bigger). Same with the FE167. dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
|
I've seen Fonken's plans, they are very interesting. Do you think they could be better than Fostex' one? As said this enclosure does not satisfy me at all, even being a kind of BLH.
Thanks Z. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: victoria BC
|
Quote:
FWIW, of the Fostex "recommended" enclosures that I've built or heard for a wide range of their 3-6" drivers, I've yet to hear one that wasn't surpassed by certain DIY/open source designs. Note that the Fonken family evolved around the T/S parameters of the (now late/lamented) Fostex FE127E and FE167E drivers. With some minor tuning to port/slot dimensions and/or internal volume, this particular "platform/architecture" has proven to be adaptable to other makes of drivers as well. (most notably those by Mark Fenlon). Before getting too involved in dispensing any type of "helpful advice", I always like to pose a few questions regarding the application: -do you have the drivers on hand or on their way? -room size/listening position? -amplifier type/power level? -listening habits/tastes (types of music/volume levels) ? -"domestic acceptance factor" - i.e. "partner" or parents involved in what you can get away with? from almost 40yrs of experience, this can be as significant as room limitations
__________________
you don't really believe everything you think, do you? community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com commercial site planet10-HiFi |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
Your best bet for simple is the Frugel-Horn Mk3 dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Help: which 166/7/8 enclosure for tube amp ? | Bigun | Full Range | 8 | 26th June 2010 04:09 AM |
| Started my Austin 166 build | mr ed | Full Range | 31 | 23rd December 2009 12:03 PM |
| Austin 166 | ed2000145 | Full Range | 4 | 15th May 2009 05:57 PM |
| Thorens 166 | d to the g | Swap Meet | 0 | 23rd May 2007 01:31 AM |
| midrange and fostex 166 | tenderland | Full Range | 3 | 10th August 2006 01:56 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08389 seconds (77.04% PHP - 22.96% MySQL) with 10 queries |