Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Full Range
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12th October 2010, 07:51 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Default Solo-166 plans

Hi everybody. Tony Gee sent me the plans for Solo-166 encolsures, for Fostex FE166En drivers. They are similar to SOlo-103 that you can see here:

Humble Homemade Hifi

Did anybody tried them for 166?

Thanks all

Ziocalepino
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2010, 07:59 PM   #2
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
Unlike FE103, FE166 is not well suited to a BR.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2010, 05:53 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Thanks. Althought there is not a "Solo-126" project do you think these drivers are more suitable for this kind of plan? I'va a couple of them but used monunted both in Fostex pure BR and in the Fostex' original mixed enclosure BR/BLH they do not satisfy me. So with a different configuration...
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2010, 06:17 AM   #4
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
All of the FExx6 series drivers really need to be horn loaded to get any bass out of them.

FE127 works well in a Solo 127. It is called a Fonken. Be easy enuff to mutate the design to get something that looks like a Solo103 (but bigger). Same with the FE167.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2010, 04:38 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
I've seen Fonken's plans, they are very interesting. Do you think they could be better than Fostex' one? As said this enclosure does not satisfy me at all, even being a kind of BLH.
Thanks
Z.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2010, 05:01 PM   #6
chrisb is offline chrisb  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: victoria BC
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziocalepino View Post
I've seen Fonken's plans, they are very interesting. Do you think they could be better than Fostex' one? As said this enclosure does not satisfy me at all, even being a kind of BLH.
Thanks
Z.

FWIW, of the Fostex "recommended" enclosures that I've built or heard for a wide range of their 3-6" drivers, I've yet to hear one that wasn't surpassed by certain DIY/open source designs.

Note that the Fonken family evolved around the T/S parameters of the (now late/lamented) Fostex FE127E and FE167E drivers. With some minor tuning to port/slot dimensions and/or internal volume, this particular "platform/architecture" has proven to be adaptable to other makes of drivers as well. (most notably those by Mark Fenlon).

Before getting too involved in dispensing any type of "helpful advice", I always like to pose a few questions regarding the application:
-do you have the drivers on hand or on their way?
-room size/listening position?
-amplifier type/power level?
-listening habits/tastes (types of music/volume levels) ?
-"domestic acceptance factor" - i.e. "partner" or parents involved in what you can get away with? from almost 40yrs of experience, this can be as significant as room limitations
__________________
you don't really believe everything you think, do you?
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com commercial site planet10-HiFi
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2010, 05:15 PM   #7
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziocalepino View Post
you think they could be better than Fostex' one? As said this enclosure does not satisfy me at all, even being a kind of BLH.
The Fostex Hybrid (really a BR/TL) is not very good. Bass does not go low and is ill defined. A Fonken is way better but is not suitable for the FE126.

Your best bet for simple is the Frugel-Horn Mk3

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help: which 166/7/8 enclosure for tube amp ? Bigun Full Range 8 26th June 2010 04:09 AM
Started my Austin 166 build mr ed Full Range 31 23rd December 2009 12:03 PM
Austin 166 ed2000145 Full Range 4 15th May 2009 05:57 PM
Thorens 166 d to the g Swap Meet 0 23rd May 2007 01:31 AM
midrange and fostex 166 tenderland Full Range 3 10th August 2006 01:56 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:25 AM.

Page generated in 0.08389 seconds (77.04% PHP - 22.96% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio