Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Full Range
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th October 2010, 12:37 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Godzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York
Default Jamo 5 and 6" closeouts

Just for interest and experimentation, i purchased Jamo closeouts from PE. I built something using the 5" and 6" and listened to the 8" quickly... all promising but in the end i am underwhelmed. I really have not done enough listening on the 8" but having lived with the 5" for a couple months and more recently the 6" i thought i would comment on their sound.

First i apologize, these are not full range drivers... but they spec to 4,000khz so i thought i'd try rolling in a piezo. These drivers are connected to two different piezos (also from PE). The larger piezo is connected to the 5" Jamo and to me sounds bad. It's rolling in around 3 or 4k... i don't remember but no matter what value it always sounded bad. The 6" Jamo is used with the smaller rectangular piezo that sounds much MUCH better to me than the larger one (don't buy the larger one, it stinks!) crossed at about 6k.

These drivers look nice and purposeful but they seem like run of the mill basic drivers. When mounted they look really great and 'hi endie' but just don't perform the way i hoped. They were under $10 but supposedly list for $25... they are ok but nothing special. The 5" Jamo sounds full and deep but needs a xover too intrusive into the musical range for me to go. Probably a dome crossed at 2k would work but that's not the sound i like. The 6" Jamo sounds thinner (totally different sound) and dry as a dessert. No personality. At least the 5" had a fullness to its sound.

On a side note, the Dayton 6" pro sound driver (also in the pic) sounds better to me (but still doesn't perform like even a simple full range driver thru the mids, imo). In a box tuned to around 70hz the Dayton sounded richer than the Jamo's. The Dayton's required a coil (.4mh) to keep their rising response under control. But once in place, they are more natural sounding to me than the Jamo's. I'm not really thrilled with the Dayton but it's better than the Jamo imo.

I have the 5" Dayton full range pro driver on order and should get them soon. I am hoping they will sound nice thru the mids, full enough in the bass in a simple small ported or slotted box and will see if a piezo enhances the sound or can be left off... I am hopeful the little Dayton's offer value for the money... they are also pretty inexpensive. Their 6" big brother sounds good... just not as extended as it could.

Zilla
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Jamo5piezo.jpg (34.6 KB, 83 views)
File Type: jpg Jamo6piezo.jpg (39.0 KB, 83 views)
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
t/s for 15" from jamo d365 HELP wingman Multi-Way 3 24th November 2008 02:48 PM
Jamo 23503 8" drivers KozmoNaut Subwoofers 6 10th July 2007 08:37 AM
Info on "Jamo Dynamic d2e" speakers required John Biles Multi-Way 5 5th August 2005 07:02 AM
Opinions on Jamo sangram Multi-Way 15 30th April 2003 02:52 PM
information about JAMO ksl Multi-Way 0 20th March 2003 05:14 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:25 AM.

Page generated in 0.06676 seconds (68.93% PHP - 31.07% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio