Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Full Range
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 29th September 2010, 10:38 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
louischia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Singapore
Default Ron's A126 without suprabaffle & deflector?

Anyone tried Ron's A126 with FE126E without suprbaffle and deflector?
How does it sound? Care to share your experience?

- Louis
__________________
new kid on the board!
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2010, 06:07 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
I have used the Austin A166 with no supra-baffle, and no deflector. It was still nice but the deflector definitely refines and extends the bass. Otherwise, this is a horn without much of a mouth
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2010, 08:04 PM   #3
chrisb is offline chrisb  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: victoria BC
Quote:
Originally Posted by louischia View Post
Anyone tried Ron's A126 with FE126E without suprbaffle and deflector?
How does it sound? Care to share your experience?

- Louis
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjbond3rd View Post
I have used the Austin A166 with no supra-baffle, and no deflector. It was still nice but the deflector definitely refines and extends the bass. Otherwise, this is a horn without much of a mouth
Louis -for the FE126 I found the suprabaffle quite significantly improved the upper midbass/lower midrange frequencies that might not be as much of an issue with the FE166 and wider enclosure that mr Bond mentioned. For the A126, original Frugelhorn and the Horneshoppe Horn, our findings on the deflector were he describes above.
__________________
you don't really believe everything you think, do you?
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com commercial site planet10-HiFi
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th September 2010, 06:52 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
louischia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Singapore
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisb View Post
Louis -for the FE126 I found the suprabaffle quite significantly improved the upper midbass/lower midrange frequencies that might not be as much of an issue with the FE166 and wider enclosure that mr Bond mentioned. For the A126, original Frugelhorn and the Horneshoppe Horn, our findings on the deflector were he describes above.
What is the horn length of the A126? I can't find this info in the plan documents. I did a rough calculation around 2.6m. Anyone with the exact value?

Is the info below correct?

CC = 2.2l
Throat = 24cm2
Mouth = 524cm2
Length = 260cm

What about the A126 with alternate mouth treatment? Anyone tried building it? Seems like a good idea to incorporate the deflector into the box!
Click the image to open in full size.
__________________
new kid on the board!
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th September 2010, 07:56 PM   #5
chrisb is offline chrisb  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: victoria BC
Quote:
Originally Posted by louischia View Post
What is the horn length of the A126? I can't find this info in the plan documents. I did a rough calculation around 2.6m. Anyone with the exact value?

Is the info below correct?

CC = 2.2l
Throat = 24cm2
Mouth = 524cm2
Length = 260cm

What about the A126 with alternate mouth treatment? Anyone tried building it? Seems like a good idea to incorporate the deflector into the box!
Click the image to open in full size.

Ron spent a fair bit of time refining this design, of which the size and radius of curved mouth is an integral component. It's not a particularly quick build, and I'd hesitate to modify it at the risk of being underwhelmed.

To be honest, we did find a minor issue with our original build with the smaller driver chamber, which necessitated some several reconstructive surgery. IINM, Ron did revisit his initial math to confirm that what we heard wasn't just a figment of our imaginations. The results were sonically worth while, but cosmetically it did not meet the WAF.

As for the path length, if you have measured drawings, it should be calculable therefrom. I just build the darn things, so as long as the parts actually fit, I'm happy.
__________________
you don't really believe everything you think, do you?
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com commercial site planet10-HiFi
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2010, 03:12 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
louischia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Singapore
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisb View Post
Ron spent a fair bit of time refining this design, of which the size and radius of curved mouth is an integral component. It's not a particularly quick build, and I'd hesitate to modify it at the risk of being underwhelmed.

To be honest, we did find a minor issue with our original build with the smaller driver chamber, which necessitated some several reconstructive surgery. IINM, Ron did revisit his initial math to confirm that what we heard wasn't just a figment of our imaginations. The results were sonically worth while, but cosmetically it did not meet the WAF.

As for the path length, if you have measured drawings, it should be calculable therefrom. I just build the darn things, so as long as the parts actually fit, I'm happy.
The design that I have attached was found in the plan documents of the original A126 downloaded from frugal-horn webby.
I understand that not every design was ever built but I thought Ron would have calculated or simulated it before.

I read somewhere that CC for FE126 should be 2.2l, which is much bigger then the original plans. Is that what you were mentioning about the "minor issue"?

- Louis
__________________
new kid on the board!
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Role of suprabaffle pathdoc2 Full Range 5 29th May 2010 06:14 AM
Mileva Suprabaffle ChrisR1983 Full Range 3 30th January 2010 07:41 AM
Suprabaffle for widerange + tweeter? fred76 Full Range 3 3rd May 2007 06:57 AM
acousto-optic modulator and deflector bluesky2005 Solid State 0 12th August 2005 07:57 PM
acousto-optic modulator and deflector bluesky2005 Parts 0 12th August 2005 05:38 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:24 AM.

Page generated in 0.10006 seconds (76.72% PHP - 23.28% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio