|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Singapore
|
Anyone tried Ron's A126 with FE126E without suprbaffle and deflector?
How does it sound? Care to share your experience? - Louis
__________________
new kid on the board! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
I have used the Austin A166 with no supra-baffle, and no deflector. It was still nice but the deflector definitely refines and extends the bass. Otherwise, this is a horn without much of a mouth
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: victoria BC
|
Quote:
__________________
you don't really believe everything you think, do you? community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com commercial site planet10-HiFi |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Singapore
|
Quote:
Is the info below correct? CC = 2.2l Throat = 24cm2 Mouth = 524cm2 Length = 260cm What about the A126 with alternate mouth treatment? Anyone tried building it? Seems like a good idea to incorporate the deflector into the box!
__________________
new kid on the board! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: victoria BC
|
Quote:
Ron spent a fair bit of time refining this design, of which the size and radius of curved mouth is an integral component. It's not a particularly quick build, and I'd hesitate to modify it at the risk of being underwhelmed. To be honest, we did find a minor issue with our original build with the smaller driver chamber, which necessitated some several reconstructive surgery. IINM, Ron did revisit his initial math to confirm that what we heard wasn't just a figment of our imaginations. The results were sonically worth while, but cosmetically it did not meet the WAF. As for the path length, if you have measured drawings, it should be calculable therefrom. I just build the darn things, so as long as the parts actually fit, I'm happy.
__________________
you don't really believe everything you think, do you? community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com commercial site planet10-HiFi |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Singapore
|
Quote:
I understand that not every design was ever built but I thought Ron would have calculated or simulated it before. I read somewhere that CC for FE126 should be 2.2l, which is much bigger then the original plans. Is that what you were mentioning about the "minor issue"? - Louis
__________________
new kid on the board! |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Role of suprabaffle | pathdoc2 | Full Range | 5 | 29th May 2010 06:14 AM |
| Mileva Suprabaffle | ChrisR1983 | Full Range | 3 | 30th January 2010 07:41 AM |
| Suprabaffle for widerange + tweeter? | fred76 | Full Range | 3 | 3rd May 2007 06:57 AM |
| acousto-optic modulator and deflector | bluesky2005 | Solid State | 0 | 12th August 2005 07:57 PM |
| acousto-optic modulator and deflector | bluesky2005 | Parts | 0 | 12th August 2005 05:38 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10006 seconds (76.72% PHP - 23.28% MySQL) with 10 queries |