|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
I am using the FE126E at the moment and I find it a little bit too shouty. The highs are clean and all, but just a little higher volume than the mid. I would like to keep the same size. Cheers.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
You want to lose the 7k peakiness in other words. You can treat your current FE126e, get FE126eN. As well the new FE126En is very close spec wise to the older FE126e, but they seem to have taken some care to deal with that nasty peak. My treated versions of these will likely not need the step i take to deal with the peak on the FE126eN.
Also considered to be broadly useful as a drop-in for the FE126e is the discontinued (but Madisound still has stock) FF125K. It doesn't have the peakiness, but the metal dustcap has a taste of the same kind of high frequency anomalies that made me take a disliking to my 1st pair of Jordan JX92S. I was unable to fix that in the pair of FF125k i worked with. Since many find no issue with the JX92 that anomaly seems to be subject to users -- you may be one of those that have no problem with it. What enclosure(s), amplifier(s)?
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Victoria, B.C.
|
Quote:
Do you hear any of this listening to the FX120's? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
No. Not the FF85 either
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Not everyone likes the results, but it may be worth trying some passive correction, a.k.a baffle step correction. I ended up using this on my 127s but it does need to be applied carefully because if over-done it tends to reduce the special sound that you liked in these cones to start with.
__________________
"The test of the machine is the satisfaction it gives you. There isn't any other test. If the machine produces tranquility it's right. If it disturbs you it's wrong until either the machine or your mind is changed." Robert M Pirsig. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
|
Hi - I used for years Triangle T17FL2 (1990) - they sounded smooth and good but needed 45L in BR to give bass to treble balance.
__________________
if it works, don't fix it ! si cela fonctionne, ne touchez à rien ! |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
These speakers are niether fish nor fowl so some of the standards do not apply. I am sure you have seen these on this site from time to time and the more I listen to them the more I like them. It is just that 7khz peak (as pointed out by Dave) that is driving me crazy. I turn the volume up or down just for that peak and the rest of the music seems muted except for the "H" woofers which I have an another amp.
I am running the horns with an Adcom SS amp and just finishing my GM70 amp which might have an effect. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
Ahhh, conical horn with open back. I have a similar setup with a LeCleac'h horn (different Fostex driver) and a Khorn bottom, active crossover.
My unscientific guess is that it's not the 7k peak that is the biggest challenge at the moment, but rather, an overall rising response. In other words, it's out of balance well below 7k so you actually have two issues. Here's what I would do (speaking strictly as a newb) and in the order I'd try: 0. If using active xover, raise the xover to see if this helps a bit. I'm using 200Hz. 1. Digital EQ, by ear listening to the human voice (using a PC, if only to find what works) 2. Simulate in MJK, Hornresp or AJ Horn -- this should probably be step #1 3. Lots of toe-in 4. physical treatment (pieces of felt) 5. If none of those work or are options, build a simple passive circuit with an L-Pad and dial it in by ear. Yes it takes a long time but you'll hit it eventually P.S. cheap SS amps on Fostex never worked for me. Personally, I've never been able to try high-quality SS though. Last edited by rjbond3rd; 25th September 2010 at 04:27 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Transistors - good replacement? | Stuey | Parts | 7 | 25th March 2007 11:27 AM |
| Good Peerless Tweeter Replacement? | PoorSound | Multi-Way | 14 | 20th January 2006 11:44 AM |
| good tempest replacement? | saramac | Subwoofers | 9 | 12th December 2005 02:57 AM |
| good replacement for ECC82 | tiagor | Tubes / Valves | 34 | 9th March 2004 08:48 PM |
| Any good replacement for PN2222? | ChuckT | Solid State | 1 | 15th December 2002 05:55 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13079 seconds (74.47% PHP - 25.53% MySQL) with 11 queries |