|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: British Columbia - Kelowna
|
gentelmen,, i have been looking around for months on this site and others, i am trying to decide on a full range desktop set (like the alpair 6 for size) or if i should build a small two way. Having never heard a good fullrange i am have no comparisons or thoughts other than what i read...I have above average/proffesional woodworking skills. I do not enjoy designing crossovers or figuring out box volumes so much as the cabinet work and sound enjoyment. I have built a few sets of two ways,mtms, subwoofers, etc.. I have specific goals in looks and sound so i thought you all might be able to tell me honestly if i should consider fullrange or build a small two way..
my goals are; near field listening, I mac with eqalizing capabilities.. cabinet width of about 4-6" max cabinet height of about 16-18" cabinet depth of about 4-7max slot port on the face of the cabinet,, i like the look and always wanted to try one. powered by a small t amp 20 watts or so i appreciate high end crispness always using metal/aluminum dome tweeters in my past speaker builds,,,silk tweeters do not have the same crispness that i like good low base extension, I dont mind eqalizing.. music selections are rock, pop, light dance.. I am cosidering using these two ways designs but perhaps altering them slightly to fit the above demensions, Piccolata Mini Monitor Or perhaps waiting for the release of the new alpair 6.. your thoughts?? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
Try an FR on it's own and add the tweeter later if required. You can do it as simply as a 1mfd cap for the XO. Works for a lot of people.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
Speaking strictly as a newb, if you (a) don't like crossover design, (b) like metal drivers (c) enjoy rock/pop/dance and (d) don't need really high efficiency, any of these drivers are fine choices: Alpair 7, Alpair 10, CHR-70 and Jordan JX92S. I too enjoy the beautiful "shimmer" I've heard from metal cones.
Box geometry definitely affects your final response (along with boundaries, diffraction etc.) The normal design process would be to start with some rough dims and spend time iterating to get something really optimal for your situation. But since you are not looking to get into that stuff (I can't blame you), if it were me locked into that geometry / dims, personally I'd try sealed, maybe aperiodic, keep the volume reasonable. Ported has more factors and you have to avoid driving them below the box's tuning frequency lest the driver exceed its mechanical limits. So I would say, personally, that I wouldn't hesitate to stick those drivers into a sealed, maybe periodic, but if you're not going to use a box calculator, you'll be optimizing your build either through trial and error, or not at all. Eventually, software becomes a great time-saver but it's also good to learn stuff hands-on. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
I never heard Mark Audio speakers ,but they have good reputation.
The Piccolata (maybe the author mean "Piccoletto",which is "small size looks good either ...even if with bigger woofers for me the tweeter has more sense . I wouldn't mind changing the position of the port(s)from rear to front panel (maybe on the bottom)since it gathers all the dusty bass information which may interfere with the clean emission of the driver . BTW I love Imac sound as itself . |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Victoria, B.C.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: British Columbia - Kelowna
|
what are the sound quality differeces between the two?
sealed vs full? where will i notice the difference? |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Victoria, B.C.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
|
I have. I had one of the first pairs of paper cone pre-production prototypes through here a few months back; they're now with Dave. Even without the Matsubara-san VC & spider which the production drivers will have, the new model is a big step forward from the original (which remains a v. good unit for its type).
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
I figure the best of the 1st gen metal cone drivers, i fully expect, based on hearing the same set of paper protos Scott had, and the production protos of the A10.2 vrs the old A10, that the new A6 will be better.
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: British Columbia - Kelowna
|
dave, how does the alpair 6 compair to the FR125? I have always appreciated the looks of the fr125, but figured i might be best to use newest technology....
kinda wish i could hear several speakers before i decide.. i see that CSS is now offering the fr125 with a tweeter,,,can i assume on its own it lacks upper detail? |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Any Fullrange desktop designs for SS 10F yet? | mayhem13 | Full Range | 0 | 22nd August 2010 04:58 PM |
| Desktop Fullrange | EdT | Full Range | 3 | 11th April 2007 07:25 AM |
| Fullrange Desktop Speaker Recommendations? | blip1882 | Full Range | 15 | 18th October 2005 03:14 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11821 seconds (82.62% PHP - 17.38% MySQL) with 11 queries |