Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Full Range
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 14th September 2010, 07:22 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Örebro, Sweden
Default Downsize a BIB

Hi everyone.

Quick question? Has anyone tried undersizing a BIBs footprint and not the length? What will generally happen? Im guessing an overdamped bass? Can that be rectified with a lower damping power amp, ie higher impedance?

Reason Im asking is Ive been oogling all the rave over the BOFU and the BIB but doing the math in Zillaspeaks spreadsheet. Its humongeous. The attachments shows my fiddling with the qts value to reach less tank like proportions.

Whats ur opinions on this?

Regards /Bo
Attached Images
File Type: png bofu_bib_spreadsheet.png (159.6 KB, 312 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2010, 07:54 PM   #2
jrenkin is offline jrenkin  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Denver, Colorado
I have seen a few people talking about using smaller BIB boxes than recommended and still sounding great. I built a set using fostex 208 sigma. they are 80 inches tall and 10" x 12", so somewhat smaller than you get for the BOFU and mine are quite imposing. BUT, they sound soooo fine....

I bet you could get away with minor modifications without a problem, maybe around the size of mine, not sure if I would explore much smaller.

I will post a picture in a new thread when I have a moment to take one, they have only been up and running a couple of days and still need to be sanded and finished.

I recommend a cardboard mock-up in full size. See what your wife will put up with and go as big as you can!
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2010, 01:34 AM   #3
GM is offline GM  United States
diyAudio Member
 
GM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
Quote:
Originally Posted by danerius View Post
Im guessing an overdamped bass?

Can that be rectified with a lower damping power amp, ie higher impedance?
Greets!

You guessed right!

Yes, and no. It will flatten the response for a better match to the larger cab's tonal balance, but will round off the LF which may/may not be beneficial depending on room loading.

That said, once you drop below ~200"^2 things start getting ugly looking in a quick half space sim, though backed up against a wall, and especially if corner loaded, it will probably still outperform any other typical cab by a wide margin with little/no BSC depending on room loading. Out well away from a wall/corner though and you may be sorely disappointed with only ~134"^2.

Only one way to know for sure though.

GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2010, 08:32 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Örebro, Sweden
Thanks GM + jrenkin.

Theyre planned for room corners. See sketchup pic. Im starting to rule out BIBs with a BOFU cuz of the size. Either change driver or enclosure type. My musical taste is more towards rock + pop so the cheap, cheerful and unfatiguing aspect of the BOFU appeals a lot. And Id rather sacrifice some resolution and soundstage and have my speaker play engaging bass instead.

Never liked the sound of bass reflexes or sealed boxes so my other options looks like TLs or Onkens. Regarding taste again. Open baffles, horns, TLs etc have had the most musicality to my ears. Fullrange of course Any suggestions for other drivers?

Living in metric land Im a bit lost on ur figures GM. Is that square inch? Cubic inch? Cubic feet? Regarding room size or?

Regards /Bo

Click the image to open in full size.
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2010, 02:07 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Godzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York
>>> once you drop below ~200"^2 things start getting ugly looking in a quick half space sim, though backed up against a wall, and especially if corner loaded, it will probably still outperform any other typical cab by a wide margin with little/no BSC depending on room loading.

Thanks for that GM. Can someone generate a frequency response chart for a BIB using the B20 in an 80" x 12" x 12" BIB. I would if i could but i don't have the software to make the chart. That's 144"^2 and with corner loading in the sketch it may work. The B20 is not about perfection, nor is the BIB, so maybe compromises can be made while still producing great sonic value.

danerius, that's a nice sketch. May i use it for the BIB site?

Also, your space seems appropriate for BIBs (and many other tall slim designs). I can envision Fostex 168S in that space too but the price for drivers goes up.

Zilla
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2010, 02:42 PM   #6
GM is offline GM  United States
diyAudio Member
 
GM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
You're welcome!

BIB net base area (Sm) in inches squared (^2): Convert

The Onken is a fairly extreme bass reflex (BR), so if you don't like typical ones.........

Rock/pop historically sounds 'best' with low Fs, medium (low, if tube driven) Qts, high Vas drivers, so what passes for big boxes on this forum is where it's at, especially when Pink Floyd or a few other groups are 'on stage'.

At this point then, it becomes a matter of finding a driver that will fit your space limitations with good output to around 27 Hz when corner loaded in a TL. In rooms I've measured, this equates to around a 38 Hz F3 with a low Qt, but I imagine your home is much better constructed to handle worse Winter conditions, so you'll probably need a somewhat different F3, Qt based on the room's gain curve that will have to be at least reasonably well guessed at before any meaningful driver choices can be considered.

Something that may be worth considering is doubling up B20FUs in an isobaric layout to halve net Vb.

GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2010, 02:49 PM   #7
GM is offline GM  United States
diyAudio Member
 
GM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzilla View Post
Thanks for that GM. Can someone generate a frequency response chart for a BIB using the B20 in an 80" x 12" x 12" BIB.
You're welcome!

I don't have any software that will do BIB corner sims, so all I can say is yours looks only marginally better than his slightly smaller one in half space.

GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2010, 03:32 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Örebro, Sweden
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzilla View Post
>>> once you drop below ~200"^2 things start getting ugly looking in a quick half space sim, though backed up against a wall, and especially if corner loaded, it will probably still outperform any other typical cab by a wide margin with little/no BSC depending on room loading.

Thanks for that GM. Can someone generate a frequency response chart for a BIB using the B20 in an 80" x 12" x 12" BIB. I would if i could but i don't have the software to make the chart. That's 144"^2 and with corner loading in the sketch it may work. The B20 is not about perfection, nor is the BIB, so maybe compromises can be made while still producing great sonic value.

danerius, that's a nice sketch. May i use it for the BIB site?

Also, your space seems appropriate for BIBs (and many other tall slim designs). I can envision Fostex 168S in that space too but the price for drivers goes up.

Zilla
Absolutely. Id be honored to have my sketch on Zillaaudio

Ive been thinkin 10" x 12" (to keep the depth/width ratio) and my BIB spreadsheet says 90.5" tall.

Regards /Bo
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2010, 04:20 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Örebro, Sweden
Quote:
Originally Posted by GM View Post
You're welcome!

BIB net base area (Sm) in inches squared (^2): Convert

The Onken is a fairly extreme bass reflex (BR), so if you don't like typical ones.........

Rock/pop historically sounds 'best' with low Fs, medium (low, if tube driven) Qts, high Vas drivers, so what passes for big boxes on this forum is where it's at, especially when Pink Floyd or a few other groups are 'on stage'.

At this point then, it becomes a matter of finding a driver that will fit your space limitations with good output to around 27 Hz when corner loaded in a TL. In rooms I've measured, this equates to around a 38 Hz F3 with a low Qt, but I imagine your home is much better constructed to handle worse Winter conditions, so you'll probably need a somewhat different F3, Qt based on the room's gain curve that will have to be at least reasonably well guessed at before any meaningful driver choices can be considered.

Something that may be worth considering is doubling up B20FUs in an isobaric layout to halve net Vb.

GM
Point taken on Onkens. Apart from cubic feet/meter figures? What else do I need to calculate room Qts? The wall are plenty thick, as u guessed, 45 cm thick outer walls, 18 cm inner with several layers of brick + plaster. Plenty warm during winters, roastin in summer. Theres two flimsy dry walls in the dinner table area but Im gonna brace those.

An isobarik TL may be a very good idea. Im gonna look more into that.

Im a Mac/iPhone guy. Conversion is widget easy once I know what to convert

And Zilla. Ive been sketchin and doin calcs on FE166/FE206. Ive some experience with FE83, FE106Σ and FE207 in the past. They have a sonic signature that favours upper mids. In no way bad but maybe not perfect for me. I havent ruled them out completely though.

Now, Ive never listened to a pair of Bofus but lore suggest theyre more in line with my preferences. Just to give u a bearing of what Im after in my speakers. I once sat down in front of a pair of Lowthers in bass reflex cabs + a mono sub. Even disregarding the timing issues between the docile sub and jittery Lowthers. Not my thing at all. If that helps

Regards /Bo
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2010, 04:55 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Godzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York
The B20 (BOFU) will have you thinking you’re listening in a lounge at a nice pub with a great sound system. A sax sounds like a sax and everything sounds natural (needs a helper tweeter or it sounds dull). Nothing stands out in that peaky way and everything is relaxed… I have Fostex and heard Lowthers and understand your reservations on those drivers (the current 168z is darker sounding than the rest of their line imo). So you will probably enjoy the B20s for years like I have. I can listen to them for hours without fatigue. When I compare them to something else they are less detailed but long term listening, the B20 is really great. What about Changs or Half Changs?

http://homepage.mac.com/tlinespeaker...map-051107.pdf
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My BiB davethomp Full Range 18 29th January 2009 10:06 PM
AJ-Horn & BiB - ar some BiB "parabolic"? freddi Full Range 3 6th April 2007 03:09 PM
Bib...? Fuling Full Range 3 11th March 2007 07:45 PM
This BIB is OK? Jaime Full Range 8 30th September 2006 08:22 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:20 AM.

Page generated in 0.12881 seconds (84.56% PHP - 15.44% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio