Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

FE166En different from FE166E?
FE166En different from FE166E?
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th August 2010, 12:27 PM   #1
louischia is offline louischia
diyAudio Member
 
louischia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Singapore
Default FE166En different from FE166E?

I notice the specs for the new FE166En is quite different from the older FE166E.

FE166E
Qts: 0.21
Vas: 45.11l
Xmax: 0.6mm

FE166En
Qts: 0.25
Vas: 37.02l
Xmax: 1mm

Madisound recommends FF165K for BK-16.

FF165K
Qts: 0.2
Vas: 48.2l
Xmax: 0.3mm

Looks like the new FE166En is not as compatible to the BK-16 than the older FE166E!

What do you guys think?

If I am going to build the BK-16 without the super tweeters, which full range driver do you suggest? The older FE166E or the new FE166En?

- Louis
__________________
new kid on the board!

Last edited by louischia; 28th August 2010 at 12:31 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th August 2010, 09:40 PM   #2
uvellani is offline uvellani  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
I tried it with the fe166e. Not as much bottom end as you would get from other designs like the fostex recommended cabinet for example.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd October 2010, 03:15 PM   #3
imagios is offline imagios  Czech Republic
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: prague
Well not to froget the comparism with the 167E

167E
Qts:0,31
Xmax: 0,6
Fs: 51,5

by the frequency responce of the supplied graphics it seems the 166En has a bether end, let say above 15KHz
it has a lover FS by 1,5Hz but a bether Xmax

both are ES cone

I for my self am currious how would the 166en perform compared to my 167E
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd October 2010, 03:46 PM   #4
Scottmoose is offline Scottmoose  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Scottmoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
As it's a replacement for the 166E, not the 167E, stating that they're different is about as far as you can take meaningful comparisons, esp. given that they are not really interchangeable in alignment terms (short of resorting to Eq).

Last edited by Scottmoose; 3rd October 2010 at 03:49 PM.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


FE166En different from FE166E?Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Some FR measurements of the new FE166En Bob Brines Full Range 19 3rd May 2012 09:42 AM
FE166e used only above 200hz............. norman bates Full Range 22 27th March 2009 12:10 AM
Fostex FE166E dimitri Swap Meet 0 22nd August 2007 12:40 AM
FE166E in dipoles xstephanx Full Range 2 14th June 2006 06:55 PM
Fe166e Qwfptl gpsmithii Full Range 16 30th April 2005 10:45 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:41 PM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 15.79%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2017 diyAudio
Wiki