I notice the specs for the new FE166En is quite different from the older FE166E.
FE166E
Qts: 0.21
Vas: 45.11l
Xmax: 0.6mm
FE166En
Qts: 0.25
Vas: 37.02l
Xmax: 1mm
Madisound recommends FF165K for BK-16.
FF165K
Qts: 0.2
Vas: 48.2l
Xmax: 0.3mm
Looks like the new FE166En is not as compatible to the BK-16 than the older FE166E!
What do you guys think?
If I am going to build the BK-16 without the super tweeters, which full range driver do you suggest? The older FE166E or the new FE166En?
- Louis
FE166E
Qts: 0.21
Vas: 45.11l
Xmax: 0.6mm
FE166En
Qts: 0.25
Vas: 37.02l
Xmax: 1mm
Madisound recommends FF165K for BK-16.
FF165K
Qts: 0.2
Vas: 48.2l
Xmax: 0.3mm
Looks like the new FE166En is not as compatible to the BK-16 than the older FE166E!
What do you guys think?
If I am going to build the BK-16 without the super tweeters, which full range driver do you suggest? The older FE166E or the new FE166En?
- Louis
Last edited:
Well not to froget the comparism with the 167E
167E
Qts:0,31
Xmax: 0,6
Fs: 51,5
by the frequency responce of the supplied graphics it seems the 166En has a bether end, let say above 15KHz
it has a lover FS by 1,5Hz but a bether Xmax
both are ES cone
I for my self am currious how would the 166en perform compared to my 167E
167E
Qts:0,31
Xmax: 0,6
Fs: 51,5
by the frequency responce of the supplied graphics it seems the 166En has a bether end, let say above 15KHz
it has a lover FS by 1,5Hz but a bether Xmax
both are ES cone
I for my self am currious how would the 166en perform compared to my 167E
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.