Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Full Range
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 24th August 2010, 03:15 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Default How well would the Tang Band 1808 work in this cab?

Thinking of putting the 1808 in this cab:
Dayton MTMC-1.0BK 1.0 ft³ MTM Curved Cabinet Gloss Black | Parts-Express.com
and crossing over to my seperate woofers at around 150 Hz. I had a nice discussion by phone with Godzilla recently (thanks!) in which he suggested a 1.25 cu/ft cab for these as being one fairly optimal solution - too bad this doesn't come .25 cu/ft bigger! Also tempted to use a small port with this (? rear mounted).
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th August 2010, 06:13 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
The more I think about it, it makes no sense to port this cab. I guess the big question is how much difference losing .25 cu/ft will make to the performance of the speaker above the low bass frequency spectrum. I'm assuming I'll have some minimal gain in using a slightly smaller cab from the standpoint of improved rigidity of the cabinet walls. My understanding is that deviations from an optimal volume are not all that critical in a sealed cab design.
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th August 2010, 06:30 PM   #3
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Hi, no advantage to porting with a 150Hz c/o frequency. rgds, sreten.
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th August 2010, 07:04 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Godzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York
Hi Racket Scientist, that box won't work because the TB driver is wider than the baffle of the box. I checked the spec sheets and see the TB is 224mm (nearly 9") wide and the cabinet baffle is only 192mm (about 7.5"). Unfortunately it's not going to work. But using a 1cf sealed box with this driver should work fine along with some kind of bass help. The driver has a clean, natural and lively sound but it's a little larger in size than a typical 8" driver. I found out after purchasing that it did not fit the 'standard' sized 8" hole of the Pioneer B20.

Godzilla
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th August 2010, 02:30 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
I'm not sure we're looking at the same thing. On the spec sheet I looked at the baffle is 228.6 at the widest. Admittedly its a very tight fit, and the edges of the speaker flange will not be flush with the rounded sides of the baffle. I had planned to route out the front to allow the flange to be flush with the front of the baffle (front loaded).
Here's the spec sheet I was looking at:
http://www.parts-express.com/pdf/302-751s.pdf
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th August 2010, 04:24 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Inside dimensions are 192mm.....driver is 190 mm+/- through hole......not good! Drivers like this need some breathing room. The close proximity to the side walls will make damping near impossible and undoubtedly minimize the potential this driver is capable of. Look for a cabinet 12" wide external.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tang Band W8-1808 Cabinet majerjack Full Range 30 5th September 2010 02:41 AM
Tang Band W8-1808 open baffle impressions Racket Scientist Full Range 3 23rd May 2010 03:47 PM
Tang Band W8-1808 8" Neodymium New $220 Pair Michael Rothacher Swap Meet 2 1st April 2010 06:57 PM
Tang Band W3-593SF vs. Tang Band W3-926SD Zaputh Full Range 17 5th June 2009 11:37 PM
RE: tang band speakers tube-lover Full Range 8 10th June 2006 09:19 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:33 PM.

Page generated in 0.09641 seconds (71.91% PHP - 28.09% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio