|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
I've been given a pair of FE207e's and I would like to build a nice set of cabinets that get the most out of them. I can't do anything as large as the full size Chang designs and am currently leaning towards a pair of Demetri's. I have been generally shying away from the MLTL designs as my understanding is this sacrifice some efficiency, please correct me if I am wrong. I would like to be able to use these with a lower power SE amp.
Are there any other designs in this size range that I should also be considering? |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
Thanks for the reply...
So the Demetri might be a good option as it seems to have a fairly wide baffle? |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: victoria BC
|
Quote:
yes, it's a fairly easy build, but not a small enclosure. I built a pair with FE167E, and even without an extra layer of material on the sides to accommodate a large chamfer, they are 447mm wide x 898mm high x 239mm deep (17.5"x35.35"x9.4" WHD) Anyone considering this design should think about making at least part of the rear panel removable,( at least during the process of fine-tuning by ear) to allow for adjustment of damping materials. I can't honestly remember if dimensions were changed much for the 207
__________________
you don't really believe everything you think, do you? community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com commercial site planet10-HiFi |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
Actually those sound like very reasonable dimensions compared to some of the big double horns!
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I have the 207 fitted in the Demetri - I love the dimensions but am not really impressed with the result.
Is there a thread showing how to damp it? Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: victoria BC
|
Quote:
I think that somewhere Dave at Planet10 has a "map" of damping scheme, but it might not have been posted in a separate thread
__________________
you don't really believe everything you think, do you? community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com commercial site planet10-HiFi |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: victoria BC
|
Quote:
So true, 72" or taller and 20-24" deep can be a bit of a hard sell for some domestic situations. Now, if my wife cared as much about the quality of sound as her garden or her new granite countertops, it'd be a different story.
__________________
you don't really believe everything you think, do you? community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com commercial site planet10-HiFi |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Denver, Colorado
|
I am working on (very slowly...) a FX207 ez BIB. Tall as all get out, but a narrow footprint.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
I'd love to try a BIB someday but the only place I would get away with it is in the basement where the ceiling is low enough I think to cause issues.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Half Chang build | bobtrancho | Full Range | 529 | 12th December 2011 12:43 PM |
| half chang or MLTL? | beauistheman | Full Range | 24 | 18th December 2008 07:45 AM |
| Half Chang or Suzy Chang with Subwoofer? | tripathdude | Full Range | 2 | 15th December 2008 04:47 PM |
| Half Chang change | risingjay | Full Range | 8 | 17th January 2008 06:52 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12316 seconds (76.47% PHP - 23.53% MySQL) with 11 queries |