|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Rebel Samurai!
diyAudio Member
|
I expected to find something on this already, but poking around didn't turn anything up... maybe my search mojo is weak today.
Should one bother to roundover, and/or do sim-work in The Edge to smooth baffle step (asymmetric baffle) when building a bipole? I expect the actual baffle step would of course be addressed. Isn't there a higher frequency mess that diffraction effects can make? Is that automagically fixed in a bipole config., or is effort to neaten that out still beneficial? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
The smoother you can make the transition the better.
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Rebel Samurai!
diyAudio Member
|
Thanks, dave.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Full roundover vs. rounded w/ corner edges | Pallas | GedLee | 1 | 22nd October 2009 02:05 PM |
| t-amp with fostex 127e bipole or FR125 bipole? | alexg | Full Range | 6 | 23rd August 2006 07:49 AM |
| roundover bit - inch and a quarter radius | smallangryboy | Subwoofers | 9 | 4th April 2005 03:11 PM |
| Roundover or chamfer behind the driver? | mazeroth | Multi-Way | 4 | 28th January 2005 07:32 PM |
| roundover/diffraction question | morbo | Multi-Way | 5 | 14th December 2004 07:27 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06926 seconds (64.01% PHP - 35.99% MySQL) with 10 queries |