|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
|
I am working on my design for computer speakers using the Aurasound NS3-193 8ohm 3" speakers.
I am using the enclosure calculators referenced on the Madisound site. Sealed 2.5L sealed enclosure has an F3 of 86Hz. Not bad! Now for a vented enclosure: mh-audio.nl - Vented System F3 is 57Hz but the vents are way too big. So I try sucessively smaller port diameters until I get down to 3/8" (.95 cm). That puts the port length at .54". Can I really drill a 3/8" hole thru the 1/2" thick side of the cabinet and get an F3 of 57Hz? Fantastic if true! Thanks for any input! -Tom- |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Small ports have higher resistance, so they model more like sealed enclosures than you'd expect. So no, you probably won't get as much extension as you're modelling.
Also, model the port velocity at reasonably high volumes - I'm guessing it'll be pretty high, which would result in undesirable noise from the operation of the port. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
|
Apparently it wasn't that simple. On the same site I found a Port Calculator and that got me a minimum diameter of over an inch.
So latest theory is 1-1/4" port (the cardboard tube from a roll of wrapping paper) about 8" long. This preserves the 57Hz model number. Sound more reasonable?? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Make sure you account for the volume of the port when you calculate the gross volume of the box.
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
|
>>Make sure you account for the volume of the port when you calculate the gross volume of the box.
Yup, my rough calculation was about 170 cm**3. Thanks to TheSeekerr, and Planet10 for the great advice. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
|
Bringing this thread to a close, here is the completed Soundbar, using a 7.5" cardboard tube as the bass reflex port, and attaching a Dayton DTA-1 T-amp as power.
First pic is assembly details with the internal dividers, port tube, and padding in place. Glue from the hobby store worked just fine. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
|
The other two pics show the completed soundbar. The bottom edges were cut off at a 15 degree angle.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Massachusetts
|
So how does it sound?
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
Looks good Tom.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
|
Sounds pretty good. Lots of bass, maybe just a tad uncontrolled, and lacks "sparkle" on the high end. But very pleasant sound.
And it sure sounds better than the built in speakers in that laptop! |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NP:"Simple Sounds Better" TGY:"Simple Food Better" | Gyuri | The Lounge | 10 | 19th December 2009 09:03 PM |
| 'Simple network lowers f3' | PeteMcK | Multi-Way | 0 | 10th December 2005 03:40 AM |
| cheap 6" or 8" woofer to make great bass for a standard cab pick up | zuki | Subwoofers | 12 | 15th February 2005 07:54 AM |
| Can I multiply an 18" folded horn cab by 0.8 for a 15"? | Optical | Subwoofers | 7 | 31st October 2004 04:37 AM |
| Crossover Experts! Hole in 12dB/octave, (both sides), response? Help!! | kelticwizard | Multi-Way | 14 | 17th July 2002 08:45 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10057 seconds (84.95% PHP - 15.05% MySQL) with 11 queries |