Alp 5 & SDX 7 slim floorstander - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Full Range
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th January 2010, 08:04 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Default Alp 5 & SDX 7 slim floorstander

Hi everyone!

First I'd like to thank Mark for his activity in these forums. You're really doing a unique job on the customer service area. Drivers aren't really that bad either..............
I've built a pair of compact, 14 l standmounts with Alp 10's front reflex loaded, and they sound amazing. If something, a bit more air in the top end would not hurt, but really after a while it doesn't bother me. Maybe I'll get to adding a super at some point but right now I'm really happy with how they sound. Even metal sounds good on these. Plenty of kick and bottoms.

Anyway, for quite a while I've been thinking about the afore mentioned combo. My idea is an elegant enclosure (25mm MDF) with the minimum possible width (around 140mm baffle) with the SDX mounted on the side of the cabinet and the Alp 5 naturally on the top/front. Height would be around 800 mm. This would result in a total internal volume of around 20 liters minus braces etc.
So the question remains; if possible at all, whereabouts should I cross the two, keeping in mind the woofer is on the side of the enclosure?
Any input and/or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Regards, Super-Panda
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2010, 10:31 AM   #2
Henkjan is offline Henkjan  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
Henkjan's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berkel en Rodenrijs
having the woofer on the side creates another design challenge.. this more or less asks for crossing as low as possible.

would you want a classic passive filtering for this box, or do you have the means to go active?
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2010, 10:34 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
This design has been previously proposed by planet10 as the "Tysen", or FAST (fullrange assisted by subwoofer technology). Do a search on this forum for more data.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2010, 10:44 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Henkjan, I'm going passive and as simple as possible. Less is more you know.. Although this this concept using a Hypex AS2.100 DSP would be interresting, but budget is an issue.
I'm aware that the crossing point will be quite low. Am I completely off if I just cross over below the woofer baffle step (in this case, baffle = side of cabinet)?
TheSeekerr, Thanks for that. I'll look into it!

Last edited by super-panda; 28th January 2010 at 10:49 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2010, 10:10 PM   #5
Henkjan is offline Henkjan  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
Henkjan's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berkel en Rodenrijs
yep, if you cross at e.g. 200Hz, the woofer will be below the baffle step point, but the Alpair will have to have a bsc. and I expect you'll need some form of impedance correction. and be aware that crossing that low with a low order filter will reduce the available dynamics, for all it's qualities, the Alpair5 is a small driver and not even Mark Fenlon can change basic physics
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th January 2010, 12:32 AM   #6
diyAudio Moderator
planet10's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 5
Originally Posted by TheSeekerr View Post
proposed by planet10 as the "Tysen", or FAST
The concept that led to Tysen was originally conceived with the the Jordan J6T (built by Mark and the direct precursor to the Alpair 5). Exactly the same concepts as in Tysen apply. The Alpair 5 is sufficiently less sensitive to the FF85 that a passive XO becomes a possibility.

Link to the Tysen thread.

Click the image to open in full size.

Putting the XO at the baffle step frequency would have required a much higher XO than i wanted if i was to maintain the slim profile, so i came up with something else.

community sites,, ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Almost new CSS SDX-7 $65 shipped dshambala Swap Meet 2 1st March 2009 04:45 PM
Almost new CSS SDX-7 $65 shipped sanjeev Swap Meet 11 15th February 2009 01:37 PM
Fonken floorstander duct seal & damping artfuldodger Full Range 5 17th December 2008 04:14 PM
Slim Devices Transporter JonHarrison Digital Source 7 26th July 2006 09:42 PM
Floorstander w/ Vifa P13 & D27 based on Wiki? nrgy Multi-Way 11 3rd June 2005 01:12 PM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:05 AM.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2017 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2