|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
hi a relative gave me a diy amp which needs 2 high-efficiency speakers. (my track record on diy amounts to installing a curcio capacitor board into an st70 a few years ago, leading to a puff of white smoke and then ... aanyway...)
im on a tight budget but id like to have some speakers for the amp to use. i dont need loudness, and i do need them to be small. so i have 2 questions: a) what are the cheapest i can buy ready-to-use on ebay? b) how would i go about making a simple, cheap, but good sounding speaker? thanks Last edited by gongli; 19th January 2010 at 06:24 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
high efficiency + small size = no bass
So if you want high efficiency with some bass, the box will need to be a good size. This is a good simple high efficiency diy project: The Big Fun Box - single driver speaker [English] |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hillsborough, NC/McLean, VA
|
The BIB design is about as simple as it gets, but it's not exactly "small"
__________________
Jim J. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Shanghai
|
Hmm, am I wrong or is 45liter quite small?
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Carp
|
30cm X 30cm x 30cm =27000cu centimeters or 27 liters, 30 cm is about 12 inches.
25cm x 30cm x 60cm = 45000cucm or 45 liters |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NorCal
|
Quote:
great speakers for S.E.X. Fostex FE166e drivers in very small boxes, with a sub or two for support. They crossed at 125 Hz with two subs, I found I could get away with 100 Hz and one sub without too much penalty. The Fostex will make the most of the low powered amp!
__________________
The difference between theory and practice is that in theory there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice there is. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York
|
http://www.parts-express.com/pdf/264-847s.pdf
Not as efficient as the Fostex mentioned above but can be put into an even smaller box and used to good effect with powered subwoofers too. http://www.parts-express.com/pdf/264-854s.pdf These woofers are on sale and can work nicely in small ported cabinets but need a powerful amp to drive them. Just a thought. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The Nebraska Panhandle
|
If you need high efficiency, you need 6.5 or 8 inch fullranger. For any given driver, a sealed box is the smallest possible enclosure, but some drivers won't give you enough bass without a more complicated box.
The S.E.X.y speaker is a very good approach. As Paul Joppa outlines, the sealed approach considerably reduces doppler distortion when compared to fullrange drivers in vented boxes (and reduces the size of the mains too). If you can tolerate a slightly larger enclosures (22-36L, say), then you can emulate it with 8" drivers (like the B20 requires a tweeter, or the BetsyK speakers I sell) (do note that the B20 requires a tweeter) and gain even more benefit. A larger driver will be even more efficient and reduce distortion further. In addition, the right driver will go lower. it might be possible to get by without a sub, especially in a small room with considerable gain. If you do need a sub, you only need one, and placement is much easier. In addition, you are free to use more interesting subs that aren't useable to higher frequencies (tapped horns, EBS alignments). I lived happily with 8"ers in sealed boxes -w- a sub for quite awhile. I'm surprised it isn't a more popular approach. If you need something simpler than a sealed box, you could consider some sort of open backed box. I've looked at some rectangular wall mounted shelves, and thought would could glue a baffle over the front, shove the back full of fill and see what happens. This approach would require a higher Qts, like the Visaton B200, my Betsy, or if you can tolerate a hump in the midbass, the $9 fullrange that is currently on sale at Parts Express. Aperiodic boxes are an option too, and more tolerant to build than a sealed box. Paul Wild Burro Audio Labs - DIY Full Range Speakers |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Power supply:Universal AC input/ Full range,High Efficiency, and High reliability | hang | Vendor's Bazaar | 12 | 24th July 2009 03:46 AM |
| High efficiency tweeter | JC951t | Full Range | 18 | 15th July 2009 04:56 PM |
| Low wattage, high efficiency, high quality? | Nordic | Multi-Way | 5 | 4th September 2005 11:12 PM |
| High Efficiency, High Power Handling? | Bogie | Multi-Way | 3 | 2nd July 2005 05:49 AM |
| Suggestions for high efficiency high SPL kit/design | Kanga | Multi-Way | 50 | 23rd May 2003 12:52 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10276 seconds (79.39% PHP - 20.61% MySQL) with 10 queries |