|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
Hi all,
I was thinking of building this design by Jim Griffin. Not so sure that i want bi-polar though. Would there be any effects of having both drivers facing forward (centered around the original driver placement). Logic tells me the resulting FR should be identical but thought i better ask first.. Cheers, Pete http://homepage.mac.com/tlinespeaker...LDesignPak.pdf Last edited by schmeet; 19th January 2010 at 04:53 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: victoria BC
|
Quote:
well, I think the effects would be that you'd lose the advantages gained from the bipole configuration, and that the measurable FR would not be identical - although by how much you could reconcile those differences to would you actually hear in a real room could depend on a lot of factors, and HP filtering one (i.e. "1.5 way") at around the baffle step frequency as determined by the front panel width could probably help mitigate some of the problems associated with comb filtering if it's floor space / WAF that is restricting your consideration of bipole, another interesting configuration might be to top fire one of the drivers as in the Planet10 "castle" microtower design in the document posted below - however with the open voice coil on the WR/FR125, dust etc could be a concern. http://homepage.mac.com/tlinespeaker...aps-150909.pdf
__________________
you don't really believe everything you think, do you? community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com commercial site planet10-HiFi |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Moving the drivers both to the front would mean that you need to add some BSC and you lose the imaging advantages of a single driver.
The one ithing i would do would be to rotate the box 90 degrees and mount the drivers on what are now the sides. This will reduce the bipole dip somewhat. Mounting the driver on the side at the same level would also work. Top mounting would not be recommended as it would screw up the designed in driver offset. The sum of my experience with the FR125 is to recommend 4.5 -7 litre aperiodic box with these for best performance. dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Offset Bipolar MLTL with CSS EL70 Drivers--Part 1 | Jim Griffin | Full Range | 44 | 28th July 2010 04:53 PM |
| Jim Griffin's bipolar mltl | RH75 | Full Range | 1 | 12th September 2008 03:08 PM |
| Css Fr125sr 4.5 | needmorstuff | Multi-Way | 13 | 4th September 2008 11:13 PM |
| Bipolar MLTL Speaker with FR125S/WR125S | Jim Griffin | Full Range | 27 | 22nd June 2006 06:54 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09138 seconds (74.03% PHP - 25.97% MySQL) with 10 queries |