|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Edinburgh
|
I wonder if anyone has experience on the effect of cabinet damping on midrange performance?
I'm nearing the completion of a small JX92S design New Jordan JX92S mini-monitor design I auditioned an initial prototype which was filled with lambswool, then later I added damping panels (bitumen+acoustic foam) to the walls, plus made a few other minor mods (e.g properly glueing the font and back panels to stiffen the cabinet and reduce leakage). Following the changes, I noticed that the midrange seems a bit recessed and lacking in power- it is particularly noticeable on vocals. Is it possible that the damping panels have affected the midrange? Or is it more likely that the poorly damped and sealed prototype was adding some midrange colouration? So far I have not added baffle-step compensation. Any thoughts/help would be greatly appreciated. It is very interesting how relatively minor changes to the box design can affect performance. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Jordan JX92s - Which cabinet Build | jfs | Full Range | 9 | 13th December 2009 10:50 PM |
| Cabinet Damping | patherb | Multi-Way | 11 | 12th July 2008 12:54 AM |
| Cabinet Damping | pjpoes | Multi-Way | 17 | 13th April 2007 08:06 PM |
| Alternate Driver for Jordan JX92S TL Cabinet | Inniswhe | Full Range | 11 | 28th November 2006 07:52 PM |
| internal cabinet damping gloop | jives11 | Multi-Way | 6 | 5th July 2006 09:29 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.05091 seconds (77.22% PHP - 22.78% MySQL) with 10 queries |