Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Full Range
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12th November 2009, 08:46 PM   #11
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scottmoose View Post
Yep, nice site indeed.

Thanks, and please let me know if you spot any more errors.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2009, 09:25 PM   #12
chrisb is offline chrisb  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: victoria BC
Quote:
Originally Posted by just a guy View Post
Chris, we went through all this in the frugel-horn thread. About 20 pages worth. I tried everything you mentioned and so so much more. I don't want to go through all that again, so suffice it to say it's not panel resonances and it's not improper placement causing the massive twin midbass peaks - which are my main complaint. It's simply an undersized horn and no amount of tweaks, deflectors or careful room placement is going to completely fix it.

I have a lot of respect for everyone involved (including you of course) and their other published works so I hope we can just agree to disagree on the FH and let it go.

done

If I may ask a few of questions re the BIB project - much written on your site on the measures, etc, but not much about the subjective evaluation.

Pardon me if this has been discussed elsewhere, but what are your impressions? The one photo on the site that shows your system setup doesn't give much of a clue as to position in relation to the 3 corner boundaries. How much variation in bass extension and ripple did you hear with different placements relative to the back wall? - i.e. was there an optimal distance?


Have you had much experience with the CSS FR/WR125, which is hinted that you might try in a BIB ? If not, perhaps you're unaware that even though they may possess "more regular" or smoother specs than the FE126E, one disturbing characteristic is their performance when X-Max is exceeded. Based on several of my own builds with them, I'd describe it as ungraceful, particularly in larger, less than critically damped vented enclosures.
__________________
you don't really believe everything you think, do you?
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com commercial site planet10-HiFi
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2009, 09:48 PM   #13
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
I like the BIBs a lot. The picture you are referring to shows them in the living room, where they spent about a day. IIRC none of the speakers I've tried there sounded any good. Now, they sit in the front corners of a room that's 14.25 x 11.25 x 7.5 feet. It's a terrible little room as well but it's what I have. The boxes are so large and imposing that I've never had them away from the corners. They sit about 1 or 2 baseboard widths away from the walls, tight in the corners.

I reviewed the BIBs quickly in the BIB thread awhile ago, and at that point they had a whole lot more stuffing in them. Measurements taken then compared to the measurement posted on the webpage (with very little stuffing) show the stuffing provides a much smoother response, with the peaks rounded off significantly. I use parametric eq to flatten everything out a bit and counter some of the effects of the room modes.

In these boxes, I have tried the Pioneer A11, Fostex FE108E Sigma, FE126E, and CSS FR125. The A11 didn't last long since it needed a tweeter and I didn't want to mess with that. Also, we measured the A11 fs at 113 or so (IIRC) so a bit too high to be a good match for these boxes. The 108 was soon abandoned in search of more bass and more treble, and it's fs is a bit high too. The 126 had a 90 hz fs and surprisingly high .41 qts but was clearly the best match so far. And then I very briefly tried the CSS on loan. I liked it but didn't have too much time with them. Can't declare a winner either, since it was days in between listening to the CSS and Fostex.

Beyond that I don't have much subjective to say except that the performance is impressive considering the driver size but size is somewhat prohibitive. For most material no sub is needed, but they only get down to 50 hz or so.

Last edited by just a guy; 12th November 2009 at 09:51 PM.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Got myself a webpage! keantoken The Lounge 8 17th October 2006 03:13 AM
CSS FR125s project webpage theNoid Full Range 10 13th August 2005 06:53 AM
Webpage of Elector Ryssen Elektor 1 26th December 2003 01:25 AM
Finally made a new webpage! Duo Everything Else 24 17th January 2003 12:29 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:18 AM.

Page generated in 0.07911 seconds (76.60% PHP - 23.40% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio