|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
OK....I have been loving my Saburo's with Planet 10 EnAbled FE126's for almost a year now. Imaging and soundstage are increadable. I have added powered subs but do not use them most of the time. The only thing I find missing is the physical "weight" of the sound.....or is it the "largeness" of the sound. It is hard to describe but it is a physical property. So, here is what I have been thinking. I am lucky to have another set of EnAbled FE126's on the shelf. What about a double Saburo.....built side by side? Would it need to share any of the horn path? Should the horn length be different between the two? Would doubling the cone area actually contribute to the sound and help give it more "weight"?
I do not have to worry about WAF.....so, do I have anything to gain, or should I be pursuing another path? |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hmmm...youŽd get some more "weight" (I think I know what youŽre talking about), but that pinpoint sharp imaging will suffer with two drivers per side.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Saburo's Vs. DTB | Dave the bass | Full Range | 131 | 18th November 2009 04:25 PM |
| Saburo question for Scottmoose and Dave | soundsinthestix | Full Range | 7 | 22nd January 2009 08:01 PM |
| FAO: Scottmoose | whitecrook | Multi-Way | 0 | 16th November 2008 01:47 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06163 seconds (69.59% PHP - 30.41% MySQL) with 10 queries |