Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Full Range
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 3rd September 2009, 01:40 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
brucegseidner's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Default Cabinet strengths and dynamics

In comparing a design like the Mikasa Horn with a cabinet depth of 15 inches and the single driver Coniston BVR with a cabinet depth under 10 inches, what is gained and lost assuming drivers of similar efficiency?

The value of parsimony aside, I have a table saw and not Occam's Razor, and without regard to bang for buck, time=money, etc. What are the performance differences?

On what rational basis would one choose etiher cabinet over the other sonically?

Also, would it be possible to share the specific formulas employed to design the Mikasa using the T/S values of the FE126? And the specific formulas used to design the Coniston using the T/S values of the CSS EL70?

Just like 9th grade Algebra, it really helps to show the work in addition to the answer for those who want to learn how this works.

This may pass into the range of paid consultation and I would respect that and hoped to be contacted back channel. I get paid for my time and expertise, I would understand if others felt the same.

Thanking all in advance.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2009, 03:10 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Scottmoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
I'd be wary comparing them for the simple reason that you are not comparing like with like; they were designed for different drivers, with different goals. About the only thing they have in common is the fact that they have a terminus above and below the driver.

Leaving the terminus configuration aside, long-path & BVR (well, they're almost all BVR in a sense, but you know what I mean) both have their positive & negative aspects; you use what best suits your requirements. Generalising like mad, your small-chamber, long-path horn typically works & is employed over a wider BW, offers more gain and assistance in correcting for step-loss etc., and provides tighter control over driver displacement, i.e. it'll go louder cleaner. A BVR is easier to build, operates over a narrower BW, a typically smoother basic FR (unless you're using full-sized 'optimal' BLHs, in which case you'd a/ better have a ballroom to put them in, and b/ some form of digital delay) and less delay-time, which can be a factor in longer horns.

For the rest, it's pretty much a case of reading up on horn design theory. There are a few threads here that list the papers & sources of information. The major ones are listed here: Physical explanation of how horn speakers work

Last edited by Scottmoose; 3rd September 2009 at 03:12 PM.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Image Dynamics idMax 12 D2 V.3 aemixes Swap Meet 1 27th April 2009 10:05 PM
Dynamics in Loudspeakers gedlee Multi-Way 181 8th October 2007 08:31 AM
My Audio Dynamics/ADC amp needs help! saabracer23 Solid State 5 7th March 2007 05:24 AM
Hammer Dynamics gchrist Multi-Way 7 6th March 2006 03:48 PM
breuer dynamics pamaz Analogue Source 17 7th April 2004 07:22 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:03 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 30.00%)
Copyright ©1999-2013 diyAudio