|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#31 | |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
|
And now for something completely diferent...
Scott Do you have any thought of how the CHR-70 would perform in a BIB? I might just build one and find out because it looks so cheap and simple. I'm leaning towards buying the CHR-70s because in all the reading I've done I can't seem to find any really good reasons to justify the higher cost of the EL70 or Fostex drivers. Last edited by CrookedChris; 26th August 2009 at 06:56 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
|
Should work fine.
As for the rest, it's not really a matter of justifying anything; they're different drivers, designed for subtly different purposes & offer different things, so YMMV as always. The EL has greater sensitivity than the CHR & a slightly different balance; in the Fostex drivers, efficiency is still higher & the balance is different again. And so on & so forth. You pick & choose what's right for your particular needs. Last edited by Scottmoose; 26th August 2009 at 08:36 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
|
Quote:
Well. I did the calcs for a CHR-70 based BIB and if I trim 0.8 inches off the calculated height I can get two cabs out one one 4x8 sheet. So I might just whip a pair of those together as my introduction to this hobby and to have something decent to run with my NAD. In the mean time I'll definitely look more into the Maeshowe and Lotus and perhaps the Frugel-horn or whatever else pops up. Last edited by CrookedChris; 26th August 2009 at 08:34 PM. Reason: Grammar |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
|
You'll need the downward-firing variety of BIB if you're going to do what I think you are & have a 48in tall cabinet. Upward-firing won't couple to the room properly in a box that short.
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
|
Quote:
I'm only really familiar with the design on the zillaspeak.com website which is upward firing and which is also where I got the spreadsheet for doing the dimensional calcs. What's the minimum height to couple with the room I described in my first post? Is it a function of room size and/or ceiling height? Can you point me in the direction of something downward firing or can I simply flip the upward design on it's head with some feet? |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
|
Depends on how tall the ceiling is. For the rest, just flip the box inverted, add feet so the termius isn't shorted out, & move the driver to 0.416 line length rather than 0.217 so it's at a reasonable height above the deck.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| can I add additional Full range driver to my enclosure | shuggi67 | Full Range | 6 | 2nd August 2009 04:45 AM |
| HELP with driver selection for existing enclosure | fazman | Multi-Way | 4 | 26th October 2007 02:24 PM |
| JMR Trente's as Full Range Enclosure? | kstylianos | Full Range | 5 | 20th March 2007 11:18 PM |
| Full-range enclosure plans depository | GrahamnDodder | Full Range | 0 | 5th March 2005 03:01 PM |
| Multimedia Satellites, Open Baffle?, Full Range? Driver Selection Help Required | ozynigma | Multi-Way | 32 | 7th May 2004 03:29 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10010 seconds (76.11% PHP - 23.89% MySQL) with 10 queries |